Search for: "FIELDS v. USA" Results 161 - 180 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2020, 7:45 am by Kalvis Golde
Oracle USA on “the ongoing vitality of staunch yet nuanced textualism in federal statutory interpretation and [the] recovery of litigation expenses in any number of fields beyond copyright. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 10:28 pm
The Military CommissionsIn the case of USA v Omar Khadr, the defense recently had several pre-trial motions denied by military judge Peter Brownback. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:16 am by John L. Welch
., Serial No. 77412149 [Section 2(d) refusal to register HeartWorks for “apparatus for measuring blood pressure, body fat, weight and pulse, namely, body and health monitoring machine for standard measurements, namely, weight, body mass index, body fat content, heart rate and blood pressure, to be operated by an individual in public indoor locations” and “wheelchairs; convertible wheel chairs” in view of the registered mark HEARTWORKS for "Medical equipment, namely,… [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:12 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court’s per curiam order in Allaithi v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of oral argument on a high-stakes legal battle between a brand-name drug company and a group of companies making generic drugs – Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday was the 43rd anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
 The Court also denied cert. without comment in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The process was covered by the Field Fisher and Information Commissioner’s Office blogs. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:49 am by Michael Ginsborg
Two attorneys of Advocates for Faith & Freedom represent the County - Robert Tyler and Jennifer Monk.12/17/09 San Diego Gay and Lesbian News:In this opinion article, Fernando Lopez, Field Coordinator of Marriage Equality USA – San Diego,faults the Imperial County Board of Supervisors for approving of the motion to intervene:Here comes the shady part: The motion was passed Tuesday without being clear on the agenda. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Potential inducers of patent infringement here could be the sellers of the 3D printers, someone providing CAD files of the patented device, or websites that sell or share various CAD files that instruct the 3D printer to make the patented invention.IPBiz notes In a 6-2 decision in June 2015, the United States Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]