Search for: "FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA" Results 61 - 80 of 1,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2008, 1:36 pm
The ILB had lost track of this federal lawsuit involving Common Cause and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, first mentioned in a Feb. 7, 2006 ILB entry. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Here is the press’s description:This book recounts for the first time the compelling story of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania which traces its history back to 1789 and the Judiciary Act signed by President George Washington. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm by Edward Foley
 They rejected federal judicial involvement in the key legislative debates on the ECA. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
The two-step approach would unfold like this: First, plaintiffs challenging gerrymandered state legislative maps will ask state courts to decide whether those maps meet voting-rights requirements of state constitutions and statutes. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 2:48 am by Jacob Wirz
The post Judicial Review Bars in the Patent System, Medicare, and Beyond, by Laura Dolbow appeared first on Yale Journal on Regulation. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 11:20 am by Employment Services
”The Judicial Panel disagreed with plaintiffs, primarily citing the common questions and issues in both cases, previously transferred cases with similar arguments, and the fact that similar claims were filed by the same plaintiffs in the ongoing Pennsylvania claim. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:53 am by Kristen Matteucci
” Following the amendment of Pa.R.Civ.P. 1930.4, the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania posted a fillable Form 3b.1 Affidavit of Service by Commercial Carrier on its Forms webpage (currently listed under Court Common Pleas Family Court - Domestic Relations > Divorce) for use in accordance with the rule. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:47 pm
_Id._ The district court disagreed, “concluding, first, that [plaintiffs’] challenge to the enforceability of the class action waiver was a question of arbitrability for the court to decide, and, second, that the entirety of the Arbitration Agreement was enforceable. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Third Circuit decision addresses free speech and termination for just cause issuesRita Miller v Clinton County [Pennsylvania], USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket # 07-2105In this case, the Circuit Court of Appeals sets out the guidelines followed by courts in resolving claims by public officers and employees that their employer has violated their First Amendment right to free speech and the impact of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement on judicial control over the… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am by Bexis
  After first trying, and failing, to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to take a certified appeal, the Third Circuit predicted the adoption of the Third Restatement as Pennsylvania law. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The 2018 Pennsylvania Attorney General’s grand jury report on the six Pennsylvania dioceses not yet investigated for clergy sex abuse looked like it could move mountains at first. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
  This uncertainty is the result of an ever-growing split of authority not only between the Pennsylvania state and federal courts, but also among, and even within, the different federal district courts across the Commonwealth. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:28 am by Beck, et al.
Middletown Area School District, 110 Dauph. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:33 am
I.H. sought judicial review of this decision, and the home school district moved to dismiss.   [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:50 pm by Admin
The most significant judicial decision to change workers’ compensation law in the last 20 years occurred on June 20, 2017 when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued Protz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 2:50 pm by Admin
The most significant judicial decision to change workers’ compensation law in the last 20 years occurred on June 20, 2017 when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued Protz v. [read post]