Search for: "FMR LLC"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
FMR LLC, which was handed down on Tuesday. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 8:01 am
FMR, LLC, No. 12-3, the Supreme Court expanded the coverage of an anti-retaliation claim under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) to an employee of a privately-held contractor (the […] [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
FMR LLC, resolving a dispute over the scope of the whistleblower provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
FMR, LLC the Supreme Court extended the reach of Sarbanes-Oxley to potentially millions more employers when it ruled that SOX's whistleblower protection applies to employees of private employers that contract with publicly-traded companies. [read post]
SOX Whistleblower Protection Extends to Employees of Private Contractors, According to Supreme Court
6 Mar 2014, 2:26 pm
FMR LLC, 571 U.S. ___ (2014). [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
FMR, LLC, and took an in-depth look at Justice Ginsburg's majority opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:22 am
FMR LLC, the court, in a majority opinion written by Justice Ginsburg, concluded that extending protection to employees of a contractor was consistent with the purpose and intent of Sarbanes-Oxley: to protect investors and restore trust in financial markets. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:44 am
FMR LLC, in which the Court held that the anti-whistleblower protection provided by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 applies to employees of private contractors working for public companies. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
FMR LLC, the Court decided that the anti-retaliation provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:45 am
FMR LLC., 571 U. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 7:37 am
FMR LLC, Etal , Case 12–3. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:33 am
FMR LLC, a divided Supreme Court confirmed that the whistleblower protection of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act extends to employees who work for contractors of public companies. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:52 am
FMR LLC, the Court held that the anti-retaliation protection provided to whistleblowers by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 applies to employees of private companies that contract with public companies. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
FMR LLC (opinion here). [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
FMR LLC, No. 12-3 (U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:06 am
FMR, LLC [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 8:45 am
FMR LLC [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the whistleblower provision 18 USC § 1514A [Cornell LII backgrounder] of the Sarbones Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) [text, PDF] protects employees of private contractors and subcontractors performing work for the public company, just as it shelters employees of the public company. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:32 am
FMR LLC concerning the rights of whistleblowers who work for private contractors doing work for public companies under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 1:43 am
FMR LLC ET AL.CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT... [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
FMR LLC (we covered the oral argument here) affect a whistleblower’s choice between initially pursuing a Dodd-Frank claim in federal court, or filing a Sarbanes-Oxley claim with the Department of Labor? [read post]
