Search for: "FNS"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2023, 8:19 am
[FN: The FDA expressly “does not address other types of mammalian milk, such as goat milk, sheep milk, and camel milk, that may be used as substitutes for milk. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 3:52 pm
See fn. 1 here for the court's response to a rant representing a "lapse in professoinalism. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:47 pm
[fn 2] Apart from submitting an inadequate appendix to this Court, Ms. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:25 am
Superior Court, S230051.How not to behave at oral argument, here:{Fn.2} [Pro per appellant] requested oral argument in this case and appeared in the courtroom. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 9:14 am
"Fn.5: "The term 'brief'—derived from the Latin brevis, meaning short—seems inapt here. ... [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:34 pm
Escalante of the Los Angeles Superior Court will be sitting Pro Tem in Division Seven from March 20, 2023 until March 31, 2023.Here's a death knell unpub; and here's an unpub with a section titled "Some Words About the Amicus Briefs"; and check out fn. 4 in this unpub, where 4/1 declines to follow the 5th Circuit; and this unpub, which has a lot of color exhibits. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:49 am
App. 4th 304, 306 fn.4 (2006); see also this video. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:39 am
(See also fn.1 for another missing parenthesis.) [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:27 pm
An interesting fn.1 here re use of unpublished decisions.The DJ just reported as a "breaking news" alert: State Bar Prevails in Contentious Legal Battle, regarding the case involving former Executive Director Joseph Dunn. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:46 pm
Enjoy fn.23 here for a 4th wall breaker of sorts.A real Dusey [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:05 pm
Interpretation (statute): Rule of the last antecedent:(Fn. 6) The classic example comes from Barnhart v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Op. at p. 10-11 and fn. 12The court ultimately found that, given the history of the case, the Plaintiffs were left with insufficient time to obtain a new expert. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:49 am
Those should be familiar names, as both are past LACBA presidents.Also the State Bar Trustees have decided to drop the bar exam from three days to two starting in July 2017.See fn.11 here, where 2/1 dings appellant's counsel for filing "Exhibits In Support Of Opening Brief" instead of properly naming it "Appellant's Appendix" and for failing to include the notice of appeal.Today's DJ has a piece by GMSR's Alana Rotter, One Bit of the Apple, about the… [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 11:48 pm
Superior Court (1983) 139 Cal.App.3d 1044, 1049 fn. 3, regarding the doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
(See id., at pp. 185-186, fn. 4.) [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 7:21 am
Today, the FN will use this climate, and the left-wing Socialist Party’s rejection of more stringent security measures to claim validation and clairvoyance. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 7:20 pm
He attended the hearing on the bill and reports as follows: NH House Bill 619-FN - “AN ACT prohibiting images of a person’s residence to be taken from the air” The NH House Criminal Justice and Public Safety committee held a hearing on this bill [on] 2/19/2013. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
FAQs, p.6, fn. 7 The Division’s January 17, 2017, edition makes two more very significant changes: (1) to obtain a marker, counsel must identify the client (FAQs, p.3) and (2) amnesty for executives is not guaranteed under the often-used Type B Leniency. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
FAQs, p.6, fn. 7 The Division’s January 17, 2017, edition makes two more very significant changes: (1) to obtain a marker, counsel must identify the client (FAQs, p.3) and (2) amnesty for executives is not guaranteed under the often-used Type B Leniency. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:15 am
App. 3d 1260, 1264, fn. 2, 54 Cal. [read post]
