Search for: "FRANCE v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA"
Results 61 - 80
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2013, 2:51 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in South Carolina v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” At the birth of the United States, copyright was couched in terms of property more often that not. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm
If France v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am
See Conte v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:25 am
Moreover, it was a decision that was largely imposed (in Bell’s picture) on the south by people in the north. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” France Animation v Robinson – a case comment — Barry Sookman examines a recent decision from the Quebec Court of Appeals that he calls a “gold mine for copyright lawyers. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” Copyright Promotes Knowledge The copyright statutes passed in the States prior to the drafting of the Constitution use similar language. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Yet six of the twelve pre-Constitution state copyright acts — Connecticut, Georgia, Maryland, New York, North Carolina, and South Carolina — explicitly gave the author of a work “the sole liberty of printing, reprinting, and vending” that work, suggesting that protection of copyright was compatible with the goals of a free press. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
The Federal Arbitration Act and Testamentary Instruments North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 90, 2012, Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-29David Horton University of California, Berkeley - School of Law Loyola Law School Los Angeles Accepted Paper SeriesAbstract: The U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Schwalm, Emancipation's Diaspora: Race and Reconstruction in the Upper Midwest (University of North Carolina Press, 2009). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
The plaintiffs in Goodyear could not establish specific jurisdiction in their chosen forum of North Carolina: they were complaining about a bus accident in France caused by a tire manufactured in Turkey by a Turkish defendant. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The North Carolina court had concluded that because at least some of the subsidiaries' products ultimately ended up in North Carolina, North Carolina could exercise general jurisdiction over them. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
TRADE Washington, D.C. : Inside Washington Publishers, c1983- See Catalog Commercial policy -- Environmental aspects -- Case studies TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT : LAW AND POLICY / CHRIS WOLD, SANFORD GAINES, GREG BLOCK Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2005 K3943 .W648 2005 See Catalog Common law -- United States -- History COMMON LAW, HISTORY, AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, 1790-1900 / KUNAL M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
TRADE Washington, D.C. : Inside Washington Publishers, c1983- See Catalog Commercial policy -- Environmental aspects -- Case studies TRADE AND THE ENVIRONMENT : LAW AND POLICY / CHRIS WOLD, SANFORD GAINES, GREG BLOCK Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, c2005 K3943 .W648 2005 See Catalog Common law -- United States -- History COMMON LAW, HISTORY, AND DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA, 1790-1900 / KUNAL M. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
After two American boys died in a bus accident outside Paris, their parents sued Goodyear USA, as well as Goodyear subsidiaries in Turkey, France, and Luxembourg, in North Carolina state court alleging defective tires had caused the fatal accident. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:23 am
The only contacts that these subsidiaries had with North Carolina were that some of their products were sold – through intermediaries – in the state. [read post]
