Search for: "FRANK DOE 1-5"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,403
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2014, 8:25 am
Frank reported a “symptom” of unsteady gait/difficulty walking of 1%, but he and his Chinese colleagues did not report whether this 1% had musculo-skeletal or neurological problems. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Candidly, Rawls on legal method does not inspire confidence that the trusted arbiter can deliver the goods. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 7:09 am
” That requirement, the Court reasoned, “does not apply to section 78u-6(h)(1)(A). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
Does Dodd-Frank effectively grapple with issues pertaining to risk? [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:10 am
Suppose, for example, that you ask someone to choose between two hypothetical worlds: World A, in which he has a 5 in 10,000 probability of dying on the job each year while the corresponding probability for other workers is 10 in 10,000; or World B, in which his annual probability of dying is 2 in 10,000 and the corresponding probability for others is 1 in 10,000. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
By Bret Busacker On August 5, 2015, the SEC approved the final rules on the so-called “CEO pay ratio disclosure” under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:00 am
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, if the SEC issues a sanction greater than $1 million as a result of a whistleblower’s tip, the whistleblower can receive between 10 and 30 percent of the sanction amount. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 pm
The new report does answer some questions, Clark said. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:36 am
I focus in the paper on 6 key provisions of Dodd-Frank: 1. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 5:13 am
In particular, the recently passed Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd Frank Act) is certain to produce a large volume of new regulations and reporting burdens[1]. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:52 am
Unfortunately, as of October 1, 2012, a total of 237 Dodd-Frank rulemaking requirement deadlines have passed, and just 37.1% of the required deadlines have been met with finalized rules. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:53 am
Table 1 shows the federal agency meetings with financial institutions to discuss the Volcker Rule posted between July 26, 2010, and July 5, 2011. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:47 am
Related Posts: Dodd-Frank @ 1: Volcker Rule By The Numbers Dodd-Frank @1: The Volcker Public Comments Dodd-Frank @1: Screwing Joe The “Plummer” [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:30 am
Frank Pommersheim, does not speak or understand English. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 10:35 am
SEC proposed Rule 9j-1 to prevent fraud and manipulation in the trading and exercise of security-based swaps exceeds the authority granted the Commission under Section 763(g) of the Dodd-Frank Act, said a global hedge fund association, and go beyond Congress’s delegated authority in extending the prohibitions of Rule 10b-5 to ongoing obligations between the execution and extinguishment of a security-based swap contract which do not fall within the statutory… [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
That bill would have increased the thresholds for "accredited investors" from the current levels ($1 million in net worth or annual income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000 for those years), and would have required the SEC to adjust the new amounts "not less frequently than once every 5 years, to reflect the percentage increase in the cost of living. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:05 am
[I am quoting pieces of what Robert Frank wrote (in italics) and my responses. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm
Tammy appeals the judgment in favor of Louise; she does not appeal the trial court's ruling with regard to her cross-complaint. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:55 pm
Tammy appeals the judgment in favor of Louise; she does not appeal the trial court's ruling with regard to her cross-complaint. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
On appeal, the defendants claim that (1) the California judgment is unenforceable for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) the contract is unenforceable under the Home Solicitation Sales Act (HSSA), General Statutes § 42-134a et seq., and (3) the amount of damages awarded by the trial court was improper. [read post]
