Search for: "FREDERICK C. HARMS"
Results 21 - 40
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
C. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:28 pm
In this example, and others like nudging to promote voting or environmental protection, personalization primarily benefits third-parties—neither A nor B, but instead C. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
New York decision; and decision C, the extension of this protection to sexually themed speech, at least so long as the speech falls outside the narrow obscenity and child pornography exceptions. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
SCOTUS blog)C. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
C. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 9:44 am
C. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
Two very influential answers - proposed respectively by John Finnis (in 1967) and Frederick Schauer (in 1979) - rely on intuitions about the way that obscene imagery affects our mental processes. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Leo Milonas and Frederick A. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:11 am
Harrison, Frederick J. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
The Second Restatement of Torts states the standard: “§ 328D Res Ipsa Loquitur (1) It may be inferred that harm suffered by the plaintiff is caused by negligence of the defendant when (a) the event is of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence; (b) other responsible causes, including the conduct of the plaintiff and third persons, are sufficiently eliminated by the evidence; and (c) the indicated negligence is within the scope of the… [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:21 am
Gilley, Cornerstone Research, on Sunday, May 7, 2017 Tags: Broker-dealers, Disclosure, FCPA, Financial reporting, Insider trading, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation CHOICE Act 2.0: House Financial Services Committee Revises Regulatory Reform Bill Posted by John C. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 3:02 am
As to himself, it could do him no good, but a great deal of harm. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
The core of the disagreement is whether everyone joined in the suing class must prove, individually, that he was harmed by the claimed misconduct that is the common target. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Brach filed on behalf of Frederick LeGrande, against Johns-Manville, for asbestos-related disease, on July 17, 1957, in LeGrande v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Nevertheless, even these cases make clear that only narrowly tailored laws that address concrete harms are likely to pass constitutional muster under either strict or intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
The world hit a record level of carbon emissions in 2022[24] and is projected to warm by 2.5-3°C by 2100.[25]Estimates of climate-related losses include: 18 percent global GDP loss by 2050 under a business-as-usual case (Swiss Re)[26]; nearly 25 percent cumulative loss in global output in the next two decades if mitigation actions are not taken (BlackRock)[27]; 10 percent GDP loss by 2050 for temperature increases above 3°C (Vanguard)[28]; 15-20 percent cumulative reduction… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:42 pm
[C.] [read post]
