Search for: "FTC v. AT&T Mobility" Results 1 - 20 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2016, 10:49 am
"Yet, as the Ninth Circuit holds today, there's nothing the FTC can do about AT&T's conduct. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:19 pm by Elijah Yip
The FTC’s interest in suing companies that allow a data breach to occur is also a growing concern, especially after the New Jersey federal district court’s decision in FTC v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
If one doesn't know some additional facts and doesn't interpret the FTC's wordings very carefully, it inaccurately sounds like Microsoft had reneged on its commitments to the European Commission:"12. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 6:35 pm by David Balto
Google• Leave a comment on What Consumers Want in FTC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
But that doesn't mean the mobile baseband chip--or "modem chip" in accordance with Qualcomm's brief--doesn't implement the standard simply because it's the central and decisive component. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
The FTC won't be able to go down that road because it's politically difficult enough for the FTC to even just defend its trial win, so there's no realistic way the FTC could agree on a more aggressive theory. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:15 am by admin
Gonzaga High – it’s akin to rushing river v. water fountain. [read post]
In its complaint, the FTC cited statements from UltimEyes’s website, descriptions on third party app stores, and press releases, which directly or indirectly represented that the app was scientifically proven to “[t]urn back the clock on your vision” and “[i]mprove [y]our [v]ision [b]y 31%,” among other benefits. [read post]