Search for: "FTC v. AT&T Mobility"
Results 21 - 40
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
SBC Communications, Inc. and the adoption of that reasoning in this district (Northern District of California) in the 2011 AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 12:26 am
The DOJ may want to wait for the Ninth Circuit opinion in Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
Square logos are for modern advertising: social media & mobile. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The FTC can more aggressively enforce the Federal Trade Commission Act and deter the misuse of mobile location and health information. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm
This "gamers' lawsuit" against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard (DeMartini et al v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 10:44 pm
Regardless of whether one shares the FTC's concerns over the impact of the transaction in question on some other markets, I think the merits of the procompetitive argument concerning mobile app stores are beyond reasonable doubt and perfectly reconcilable with the FTC's mandate, so I can't see why the FTC couldn't recognize that fact as well and figure out a solution. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm
The NYT notes that Microsoft can't just let the FTC block any of its deals as it may want to make more acquisitions, but strives to be constructive. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
If one doesn't know some additional facts and doesn't interpret the FTC's wordings very carefully, it inaccurately sounds like Microsoft had reneged on its commitments to the European Commission:"12. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:40 pm
I remember her as a witness who came across as trustworthy, knowledgeable, and fairly balanced in the FTC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
FTC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
Everyone can see now that ABK's mobile games are indeed key to opening up mobile app distribution. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
Indeed, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:31 pm
While conceding that certain unlawful fee practices may be covered by existing rules and statutes, the FTC explains in the Notice that its ability to seek consumer redress is limited or unavailable in many instances in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am
Everyone knows my bias, but even I know that PlayStation isn’t going to die off. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:16 am
"That reminded me of a passage from Qualcomm's reply brief in support of its Ninth Circuit appeal of the district court's FTC decision:"See United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
KBM, as detailed in U.S.A. v. [read post]
