Search for: "Fair Trading Co. Ltd."
Results 121 - 140
of 491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
ITC Ltd have acknowledged colour as a part of trade dress. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:57 am
AMP argued that the hanging stick figure was an unprotectable scene a faire. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
Hunter Fan Co. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:48 am
Co. of Washington, 239 P.3d 344 (Wash. 2010) 2 SR International Business Insurance Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Vaver, Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patents, Trade-marks (2nd ed. 2011), at p. 182. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:37 am
Shenzhen QVOD Technology Co., Ltd. can no longer be engaged in telecommunication services after the withdrawal of its license, the Administration confirmed. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
(…) (See, e.g., Asahi Metal Industry Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
[1] Magnetic Parts Trading Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Excess Copyright) Copyright and Canada’s trade deficit – Cui bono? [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Labs., Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:49 am
Labs., Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
The Plaintiff, on the other hand, claimed to be a 100% subsidiary of Casio Computer Ltd., Japan (Casio Japan) which was the registered owner of the trade mark Casio in India used for a large number of electronic and other products. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 8:49 pm
Ocean Nutrition Canada Ltd., this principle is still an important one for the interpretation of commercial contracts. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 7:10 am
Acadia Healthcare Co. [read post]
12 May 2017, 3:30 pm
Ltd. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
LTD. v. uCOOL, INC. https://t.co/DyoGX8FYr2 -> Use of photo in blog post is fair use says US CA Katz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
Samsung Electronics Co. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
It’s time for the seventh volume of Retromark, Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons)’s rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months.Over to Darren:Retromark Volume VII: the last six months in trade marksIt’s now three years since I began Retromark, and we are on to a seventh volume. [read post]
