Search for: "Farouk Systems Inc"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2007, 7:45 pm
Farouk Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:46 pm
Farouk Systems Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
The Complainant in Farouk Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 12:45 pm
Defendant Farouk Systems, Inc. of Houston, Texas has been accused of infringing U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:00 am
In re Farouk Systems, Inc., Serial No. 78646723 (June 19, 2008) [not precedential].The Board observed that a mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) if (1) the term misdescribes the character, quality, function, composition, or use of the goods, (2) prospective purchasers are likely to believe that the misdescription actually describes the goods, and (3) the misdescription is likely to affect the purchasing decision.Applicant did not clarify whether its goods contain silk (it… [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:56 am
Charneski issued the public version of Order No. 14 granting Complainant Farouk System, Inc. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
. * Farouk Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
The salon owner trade organization Salon FAD and the salon operators Cindy’s Hair Salon, Chu’s Hair Salon, Carastro & Company Hair Design, EnV Studio Salon LLC, New Millennium Salons L.L.C. d/b/a Salon 2000, Salon 1325, Sassy & Classy Salon and Spa, The Works Hair and Nail Salon, The Veranda Salon and Spa, Inc., Victoria’s Salon and Spa, William David Salon, and Vida Spa Salon (the “Salons”) brought suit against brand owners L’Oreal Usa,… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:58 am
Paul Ryan From CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf (PDF 1.12 MB)Letter Regarding the Roadmap for America's Future Act © Copyright GalleryWatch.com, Inc. (1999 - 2010), provided under license.NO CLAIM TO ORIGINAL U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
Int’l., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art) US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on preferred… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) CAFC Judge Rader: ‘Stronger IP system allows countries to compete in world marketplace’ (PatentlyBIOtech) Professor Mossoff’s historical paper about patent thickets, patent trolls and patent pools: relevant today (IP Dragon) The balance between standards and patent regulation (IP Frontline) Patents in a bear market (IP Solutions) Australia Full Federal Court: Commonsense approach to trade mark use and the beer/wine dichotomy confirmed:… [read post]
