Search for: "Fed Ex"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 9:15 pm
Defendant was neither recipient nor sender of a Fed Ex package with oxycodone, so he lacked standing to challenge its search. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:43 pm
Co., 927 F.2d 1200, 1217 (Fed. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 10:18 am
In re Fulton, 391 F.3d 1195, 1201 (Fed. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 1:27 pm
from Ex parte DAMSOHN It is fundamental patent law that “each and every claim limitationmust be explicitly or inherently disclosed in the prior art” for an anticipationrejection to be proper.In re NTP, Inc., 654 F.3d 1279, 1302(Fed. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
Today the PTO published a notice in the Federal Register inviting public comments on paperwork burdens associated with the Ex parte Appeal Rule (73 Fed. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
” In reRijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1532 (Fed. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 6:56 pm
" The post Mar-a-Lago Raid Judge: Trump Can Review Seized Materials Before Stating Objections To Inventory, As Feds Seek Expedited Appeal first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:38 pm
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 424 F.3d 1293, 1320-21 n.3 (Fed. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 3:53 am
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) today published a notice in the Federal Register inviting public comments on paperwork burdens associated with the changes in the procedural requirements for ex parte appeals (73 Fed. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:19 am
.): 34 Fed Defs’ Reply in Support ofMot to Dismiss FILED 5-4-2012 34-1 Fed Defs’ Ex 7 FILED 5-4-2012 35 Elwha Defs’ Reply in Supportof Mot to Dismiss FILED 5-4-2012 37 Pls’ Surreply to Feds’ Reply re Motion for Partial Dismissal FILED 5-9-2012 Prior posts were here and here and here. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:33 pm
On appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI or Board), the applicant constructed an argument based on In re Deuel (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 11:05 pm
The first run of the PGA Tour's Fed Ex Cup did not exactly transfix golf fans. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:46 am
Wattanasin, 93 F.3d 1559, 1570 (Fed. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:35 pm
Thank you "Trees for Troops" and Fed-Ex! [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:45 am
In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 3:04 am
Fed. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:23 pm
In re Kemps, 97 F.3d 1427,1430 (Fed. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 12:07 am
Feds," featuring an editor from High Times magazine, of all places, and an ex-DEA offical. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
In re Jung, 637 F.3d 1356, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 1:17 pm
§ 101as covering non-statutory subject matter.See In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346, 1355 (Fed. [read post]
