Search for: "Ferguson Enterprises Inc" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Munsingwear, Inc; and (2) alternatively, whether the judgment below should be vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Axon Enterprise v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts Jr. announces that Alito “also has our opinion in Number 15-138, RJR Nabisco Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm by John Elwood
Ferguson, 22-942Issues: (1) Whether a law that censors conversations between counselors and clients as “unprofessional conduct” violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment; and (2) whether a law that primarily burdens religious speech is neutral and generally applicable, and if so, whether the court should overrule Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
On Friday, the Cynical Musician posted an article titled Demystifying Creativity, in which he asks the question, “What is creativity? [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Bias response and the First Amendment The highest-profile case is undoubtedly Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
Box 523415 Springfield, VA 22152-5415 Phone: (703) 455-4900 Web: http://www.sbanca.com Chesapeake-Potomac Spina Bifida Association, Inc. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
.) *** CDA, Inc. (15-CA-17832; 349 NLRB No. 58) Fort Rucker, AL March 26, 2007. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/JyIMzQ (@OrangeLT) Google Explains How Your Emails Travel to Their Destination - on.mash.to/JQlRCS (Stan Schroeder) Lessons Learned from Viacom’s $1 Billion Suit Against YouTube—Baker Hostetler’s Jerry Ferguson – bit.ly/JQfBLj (Colin O’Keefe) Podcast: Top 10 Tips for Learning Predictive Coding and Forbes Legal Hydra Article - bit.ly/Jju8Bh (Karl Schieneman) Social Media in the Legal Sector… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
This suggestion appears to confuse the frequentist enterprise for evaluating evidence on the basis of statistical measures of the probability of observing at least as great a departure from expected in a sample rather than attempting to affixing a probability to the population parameter. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
Belt) The Rear View Mirror on Google+: Top 5 Stories From Last Week’s Unfiltered Orange Newsletter - http://bit.ly/HFuHC6 (@OrangeLT) Sight and Sound Act Two: Legal Tech Pioneers Return to Compete in Legal Tech Market - bit.ly/HmYAry (Monica Bay) “Do Not Track” Initiatives Could Create New Premium Online Content Market – bit.ly/HbUChf (Colin O’Keefe, Gerald Ferguson) Common eDiscovery Oversight: Underestimating Risk Of ESI… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down Under) Design valid… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
Recently, the Second Circuit issued a significant Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) decision construing the FOIA exemption covering law enforcement records that “would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law,” 5 U.S.C. [read post]