Search for: "Fictitious Defendant #1"
Results 101 - 120
of 607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 3:46 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:05 pm
The defendants will also be subject to an order of restitution and forfeiture of assets.* * * [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
The law is retroactive, so prosecutors and public defenders are already sifting through applications for resentencings. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:09 pm
The defendants challenged the jury instruction given for the charge of possession of a machine gun claiming that the jury had to find that (1) the defendants possessed a machine gun and (2) they knew the gun was a machine gun. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Defendant Lazaro Jesus Perez furnished fictitious and fraudulent accountant’s letters to Vidal, in support of various fraudulent mortgage loan applications submitted to SunTrust Mortgage. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 5:40 am
App.3d at 630 n. 1. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:37 am
Using a fictitious name, the defendant first attempted to enter to the U.S in 1995, she had claimed to be born in Texas but she was returned to Mexico when immigration officers discovered she was not the person she claimed. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 8:42 am
If you are unable to unanimously agree that at least one of the statements or representations alleged in Count 1 was false, then you must find the defendant not guilty of Count 1. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:04 am
” 1 Wayne R. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:42 pm
The Defendant Foundations are listed on Schedule 2 to the Settlement Agreement, which is the “Summary of Six-Year Transfers from BLMIS [Madoff] to Defendants in Excess of Principal,” respecting persons subject to “clawback” efforts by the Trustee of “fictitious profits” and principal. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 3:35 am
See 15 ILCS 325/14B(b)(1). [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Defendants' own press release described its proposed rules as protecting consumers against 'potentially misleading ads,'" the panel wrote in Alexander v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 2:15 pm
The applicants sought for ss. 2(1), 153.1, 227.1(1), 237.1 and 248(1) of the Income Tax Act (“ITA”), ss. 4.3, 122, 123(1) of the the Excise Tax Act (“ETA”), and ss. 1(1), 1 (2), 6, 115.2, 133 and 167 of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (“OBCA”) to be of no force and effect. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
Defendants Paul J. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:47 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:47 am
The complaint and all information provided to the court should be carefully reviewed to determine whether plaintiff has set forth a prima facie cause of action against the fictitiously-named anonymous defendants . . . [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Marek, No. 072437 Conviction for corruptly endeavoring to obstruct or impede the due administration of the Internal Revenue Code is affirmed where: 1) the inference that defendant knew about the audit was supported by the record; and 2) viewed in the light most favorable to the government, defendant's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence to support a finding that defendant was guilty of the offense. . [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:24 pm
Maryland.Thus, the court held that the defendants did have standing despite the fictitious name, but there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:52 am
Kevin Castel declined to require them to apologize to the judges who were named as having authored fictitious opinions. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:48 am
The maximum statutory penalty they face for conspiracy to commit mail fraud is 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine. [read post]
