Search for: "Fictitious Defendants No. 1 to 11" Results 81 - 100 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
This provision of Belgian law is to be interpreted in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Directive 2006/114/EC that define the concepts of 'advertising', 'misleading advertising' and 'comparative advertising'. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
See Lord Denning MR’s statement in Fraser v Evans [1969] 1 QB 349, 360. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 1:37 pm by Phyllis H. Marcus and Emma Lewis
The FTC alleged that the defendants exploited the green coffee bean fad diet popularized by “The Dr. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm by Vercammen Law
 On the evening of March 11, S.T. was working as a chemical engineer at ABB Lummis Global, located at 1515 Broad Street in Bloomfield, N.J. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 11:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in January 2023, Southern District of New York Paul Englemayer granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:27 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Asymmetry refers to the fact that attackers need only succeed once, while defenders must succeed at every engagement. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:25 pm
But in a post 9-11 world, you take these threats seriously. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  On the civil side, hospitals were nearly 20% of the defendants in health care fraud cases, other medical facilities accounted for 18%, and individual beneficiaries less than 1%. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
As of December 1, 2006, Shminden had 1.8 million subscribers and revenues for the prior fiscal year (September to September) of $73 million. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:50 pm by WSLL
  In the California suit, Appellant anticipated naming decedent’s estate as a defendant, so Appellant named “Does 1-10” as co-defendants.In accordance with statutory requirements, Appellant filed a timely claim with the Estate. [read post]
8 May 2019, 7:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Lannett also allegedly advertised C-Topical as being legally marketed under a “preliminary new drug application” in a number of SEC filings, “a fictitious regulatory category. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
This rule precludes any appeal when a defendant has fled the jurisdiction after conviction but before sentencing. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Heath, No. 07-1215 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the failure of the district court to properly state a jury charge by omitting that the government had to prove that a "substantial" amount of tax was due; 2) an instruction to the jury that they did not have to find defendant's conduct "willful;" 3) the phrase "Void where prohibited by law" and a jury instruction on whether a document with such a mark… [read post]