Search for: "Fire Equipment, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2011, 11:06 am by Zachary C. Jackson
On December 1, 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court issued its opinion in Reliable Fire Equipment Company v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:02 pm
" The employees, who were cleaning and spray-painting the beams, were also not equipped with adequate respiratory protection against vapors generated during the spray painting, according to a press release by OSHA. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:00 am
The man was a senior accountant for the Jersey City firm which manufactures telecommunications equipment. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
This ruling is in Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Mitchell Tunnard and others [2006] EWCA Civ 1735, reported here on BAILII.Helmet made and sold protective equipment, including a popular fire fighters' helmet. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
  Cal/OSHA recently cited industrial service provider Shar-Craft Inc. following an investigation of a flash fire inside a metal tank that resulted in serious burns to an industrial painter. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  There was no air monitoring for LEL in use, the equipment was not grounded and bonded, and there was no fire extinguisher immediately available (the nearest was over 1400 feet away). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:30 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
After paying about $80 million for claim for an explosion and fire that damaged the glass furnace and associated equipment of the insured’s glass manufacturing plant, the insurers unsuccessfully attempted to pursue subrogation claims against the defendant-contractors who were allegedly responsible for the incident because of negligence and breach of contract. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 11:00 pm
NO TIMELINE & NO INVOICESOn September 11, 2017, Rea Belessis retained Kovacs Security Systems, Inc., and agreed to pay over $12,000 for the company to “install, lease, service, and monitor commercial fire alarm equipment. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:20 am by bhamdefenseatty
AG Gaston Motels, Inc., 499 So.2d 368 (Ala. 1986), the Court held that the general rule was inapplicable because the residents alleged that the defendants had a duty to construct and operate: … a reasonably safe apartment building, equipped with appropriate exits and fire suppression safeguards designed to reduce the risk of injury as a result of fire, regardless of the origin of the fire. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:20 am by bhamdefenseatty
AG Gaston Motels, Inc., 499 So.2d 368 (Ala. 1986), the Court held that the general rule was inapplicable because the residents alleged that the defendants had a duty to construct and operate: … a reasonably safe apartment building, equipped with appropriate exits and fire suppression safeguards designed to reduce the risk of injury as a result of fire, regardless of the origin of the fire. [read post]