Search for: "Flying J, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Trump for President, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 1560462 (Colo. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The District Court's Interpretation of Section 241 Would Render It Unconstitutionally Overbroad Courts have regularly invalidated statutes that are "substantially overbroad," Stevens, 559 U.S. at 842, or that are insufficiently tailored to their ends, Alvarez, 567 U.S. at 737-38 (Breyer, J.). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:14 am by centerforartlaw
By Nikki Vafai[1] Since time immemorial, space has been a point of inspiration and perplexity to those who glance upon it. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am by Gene Takagi
Those policies fly in the face of our colorblind Constitution and our Nation’s equality ideal. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
  The Sydney Morning Herald reports that the West Australian Attorney-General John Quigley may have to fly back to Sydney next month to be re-examined after he made “mistakes” during his initial evidence in Clive Palmer’s defamation trial. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:11 pm by Bridget Crawford
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville (UTK) invites applications and nominations for the position of Dean of the College of Law (UT Law). [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings In addition to its economic impact on Maryland businesses and the likelihood of serious legal challenges, Maryland’s proposed digital advertising tax is incredibly vague on vital definitions, creating uncertainty about where revenue is sourced and when it is subject to the tax. [read post]