Search for: "Foot Locker Retail Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
Target Corp., Starbucks Corp., Foot Locker Inc. and Crate & Barrel are among the retailers that opted out of a previous $5.6 billion class action settlement with the card companies to pursue their own case. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
Dan AronowitzMany of you may have seen the February 5, 2024 Wall Street Journal article (here) describing the new lawsuit filed against Johnson & Johnson accusing the company of mismanaging its workers’ prescription-drug benefits. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 3:00 am by Corbin Bridge
Non-core retail assets are being sold off and some investors are seeking to acquire retailers that focus on electronics, amenities, and other high foot traffic stores. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Moreover, the ordinance was not a retail food safety measure and thus, was not preempted under the California Health & Safety Code because the provisions relating to single-use articles did not demonstrate legislative intent to preempt local regulation of single-use checkout bags. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:37 am
  Gravity Defyer recently amended its complaint, adding Finish Line, Inc. of Indianapolis, Ind., Foot Locker, Inc. of New York, N.Y., Nordstrom, Inc. of Seattle, Wash., Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. of Albany, N.Y., Champs Sports, Inc. of Tarrytown, N.Y., Sport Chalet, Inc. of La Canada, Calif., Amazon.com, Inc. of Turnwater, Wash., Zappos IP, Inc. of Henderson, Nev., Backcountry.com, Inc. of Park… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Foot Locker Retail, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 18, 2011), the Court of Appeal (First Appelate District, Division Three) addressed conflict of interest issues arising in the context of a class action settlement with objectors. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:15 am by Rob Stalter
 Assistant managers at Foot Locker Retail Inc. filed a nationwide collective action in the Southern District of California, alleging that the company misclassified them as exempt and failed to pay them overtime wages. [read post]