Search for: "Ford Motor Credit Co." Results 41 - 60 of 149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2009, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Ford Motor Credit Co., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Nov. 19, 2009) (Second Appellate District, Division Three) Dowell v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 8:42 am by Greenberg Glusker
” The LA Business Journal noted several of Lurie’s recent deals, including: Represented Transpacific Development Co. in $73 million purchase of 270,000-square- foot One and Three Premier Place in Irvine, home to Taco Bell and Ford Motor Co. [read post]
24 Oct 2005, 1:45 pm
Is MBNA uncorking the Champagne while Ford Motor Credit serves cake? [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITMotor VehiclesWhen Ford Motor Credit Has Security Interest in Car It Must Be Party to Forfeiture Within 25 Days of DemandFord Motor Credit Co., plf. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm by Walton Law Firm
Meanwhile, vehicles manufactured by Ford Motor Co. were also added to the list. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:15 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Watching the credits roll, I’d spy a small-print acknowledgement along the lines of, “Promotional consideration furnished by the Ford Motor Co. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
(On that score, see what happened in the Fifth Circuit six weeks ago in In re Ford Motor Co., No. 09-50109, slip op. (5th Cir. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:43 am
Plaintiff eventually got the vehicle by executing a release and hold harmless agreement, wherein it agreed not to return the vehicle to defendant or any member of his family.Plaintiff commenced this action to recover the unpaid balance due under the lease on grounds that defendant breached paragraph 11 of the lease when the vehicle was seized by the government and not promptly and unconditionally returned, but the First Department dismissed the complaint, in Ford Motor… [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 4:09 pm by chucknewton
Tex. 2006), ruled that an undersecured creditor, in this case Ford Motor Credit Co., was entitled not only to adequate protection payments, but “super-priority” status of the inadequate adequate protection provided during the case meant that the Chapter 13 plan had to pay those amounts before paying any of the debtor’s attorneys fee pursuant to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Ford Motor Credit Co., 179 Cal.App.4th 581 (2009), affirming denial of a prevailing defendant's attorneys' fees motion in an "unlawful" prong case in which the "borrowed" law would have permitted fee-shifting if the action had been brought directly under that law. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm by James Galvin
Inc. 17316G677 Citigroup ELKS linked to Schlumberger, Ltd. 17316G685 Citigroup ELKS linked to Wells Fargo & Co. 17316G552 Citigroup ELKS linked to The Dow Chemical Company 17316G545 Citigroup ELKS linked to Netflix, Inc. 17316G586 Citigroup ELKS linked to The Dow Chemical Company 17316G594 Citigroup ELKS linked to Ford Motor Company 17316G511 Citigroup ELKS linked to Las Vegas Sands Corp. 17316G529 Citigroup ELKS linked to Apple, Inc. 17316G537 Citigroup ELKS linked to… [read post]