Search for: "Fox Television Stations, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm
Turning to ABC’s assertion that the final rule is arbitrary and capricious, the court first rejected the argument that the revised regulations were subject to heightened review under the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in FCC v Fox Television Stations, Inc. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:23 am
For instance, in In re Fox Television Stations, Inc. (1993), the FCC ruled: Similarly, we cannot deny grant of a waiver based on allegations, even if true, that Murdoch will practice, as he purportedly did under his former ownership of the Post, racist and inflammatory journalism. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
Fox News Network had filed a lawsuit against TVEyes for recording its station continuously and creating a searchable database out of its content and the content of 1,400 other television and radio stations. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
.* Broadcast Monitoring Service is (Partly) Fair Use for New York JudgeIn Fox News Network, LLC v TVEyes Inc., No. 1:13-cv-05315, Fox News sued TVEyes, a US company that monitors and records “all content broadcast by more than 1,400 television and radio stations twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week, and transforms the content into a searchable database for its subscribers”, among the latter being the White House and the U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:48 am
TVEyes Inc., No. 1:13-cv-05315.Defendant TVEyesis a company which “monitors and records all content broadcast by more than 1,400 television and radio stations twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week, and transforms the content into a searchable database for its subscribers. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc. to justify changed findings that underlie changed regulation. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:13 pm
Fox Television Stations, Inc. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
Allvoices, Inc., No. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 1:14 pm
Supreme Court began the oral argument stage for ABC Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:59 pm
For those of us who grew up adjusting the rabbit ears on our seventies-era televisions (and having to get up to change the channel to one of the other four or five available stations – no remote controls!) [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
Sept. 5, 2013), Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:57 am
The issue is whether Aereo, by providing a service that allows paying subscribers to watch broadcast television online, is publicly performing the copyrighted programming. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
Reuters Television[8] The Associated Press v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
YouTube, Inc., et. al. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
The Act is therefore far more like the ordinance in Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:39 am
The case arose when a public television operator in the San Francisco area, Minority Television Project, Inc., was fined by the FCC for having run promotional ads for commercial and political advertisers, and decided to fight that ban in court. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
The celebrity can become embroiled in scandal, such as Paula Dean, causing an empire of product endorsements, television shows, and book deals to crumble almost overnight. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:55 pm
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:10 am
The major networks, along with some local television stations, are suing Aereo in federal court in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:57 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
