Search for: "France Telecom SA" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2004, 5:58 am
The second largest phone company in Europe, France Telecom SA, has been ordered to pay as much as $2.1 billion in back taxes and interest. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:20 am by Chanley T. Howell
The GSM Association published the guidelines which have been agreed to by Vodaphone, Deutsche Telecom, France Telecom SA Orange and others. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:25 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The Reuters account suggests the purchase price could reach 100 million euros ($122.8 million).The French state has a 28 percent ownership interest in France Telecom. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Cabinet de Conseils en Propriété Industrielle (Brevets d’invention, Marques, Transferts de technologie) situé dans le Grand Ouest, ainsi qu’à Paris et en Asie, cherche pour accompagner sa croissance et étoffer son équipe Mécanique/Electronique-Télécommunications : Un Ingénieur Brevet TELECOM (H/F) SENIOR  Vous avez pour missions notamment :- la rédaction des demandes de brevet,- le… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:09 am
La juridiction de proximité d'Orléans rejeta sa demande, notamment, aux motifs : - qu'il avait été avisé que la télévision et le débit étaient fonction des caractéristiques de sa ligne téléphonique et des équipements présents dans le NRA (nÅ"ud de raccordement abonné)… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by Jack D
La juridiction de proximité d’Orléans rejeta sa demande, notamment, aux motifs : - qu’il avait été avisé que la télévision et le débit étaient fonction des caractéristiques de sa ligne téléphonique et des équipements présents dans le NRA (nœud de raccordement abonné) dont il dépendait, - qu’il avait été informé – bien que… [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:31 pm by Kelly
Highlights this week included: District Court S D New York rejects Agence France-Presse’s attempt to claim license to Haiti earthquake photos through Twitter/Twitpic terms of service: AFP v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:30 am by Keith Mallinson
Proponents of the new patent policy are also lamenting this lack of clarity, while trying to use this as a pretext to breach binding contractual agreements between IEEE and patent owners in previously-accepted LOAs.[4]Chart 1: More than one third (10/24=42%) of companies IPlytics portrays as leaders with LOAs to IEEE standards are unwilling to pledge their SEPs under the new patent policy or have not provided LOAs when asked to do soSource: IPlytics empirical study report on patenting and… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 6:25 pm by Moderator
” This year alone, Netherlands-based ING Bank agreed to pay $900 million to settle a Dutch probe into facilitating apparent bribes from a telecoms company with Russian roots to a government official in Uzbekistan; France’s Societe Generale SA was forced to pay $585 million after a French-U.S. probe into a Libyan bribery scheme; Pilatus Bank in Malta had its assets frozen for running a U.S. sanctions-busting scheme with Venezuela and… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
Telecoms privacy The proposed EU ePrivacy Regulation continues to make a choppy voyage through the EU legislative process. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
Advocate General Szpunar gave an Opinionin Asociación Profesional Élite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain, C-434/15 on 11 May 2017 and in Uber France SAS, Case C‑320/16 on 4 July 2017. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:14 am
Back in October of last year the IPKat posted this item on the Court of Justice of the European Union reference for a preliminary ruling in the WEBSHIPPING trade mark dispute, Case C-235/09 DHL Express (France) SAS v Chronopost SA. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
(Copyrights & Campaigns) (Copyrights & Campaigns) YouTube - Viacom v YouTube case update (IPKat) (IPKat)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York upholds eBay victory in trade mark case: Tiffany v eBay (Ars Technica) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) USPTO refuses Google’s NEXUS One application because too similar to Integra Telecom’s NEXUS mark (IP Whiteboard)     [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm by Marie Louise
(TechnoLlama) France Web 2.0 companies in France challenge data retention law in court (IP Osgoode) Germany BGH: Hyperlinks, freedom of expression and copyright infringing software – I ZR 191/08 (IPKat) India Delhi High Court grants order in favour of UTV Software Communications restraining cable operators from distributing movie ‘Thank You’ (Spicy IP) Italy Italian court orders all ISPs to block BTjunkie (TorrentFreak) Sweden Pirate Bay becomes ‘Research… [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Advocate General Szpunar gave an Opinion in Asociación Profesional Élite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain, C-434/15 on 11 May 2017 and in Uber France SAS, Case C‑320/16 on 4 July 2017. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
      In BhatiaInternational v Bulk Trading SA (2002), the Supreme Court rejected the contention of one of the parties that since the seat was Paris, France, a party could only approach the courts in France and not the Indian courts for interim measures for interim relief. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The derivative action pursued by ClientEarth is also a continuation of other recent shareholder actions it has launched in other jurisdictions,  including a shareholder action against the Polish power industry company Enea SA, which resulted in the Polish Court finding that the resolution authorizing the construction of a new coal-fired power plant was legally invalid. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 8:42 am by Shannon O'Hare
 COVID-19 caused Spain to adopt more severe lockdown measures and much earlier in the year than other European countries, causing severe financial problems, with the IMF predicting a 12.8 per cent decrease in Spain’s GDP this year, exceeding the predicted downturns of European neighbours including the UK (-10.2 per cent), France (-12.5 per cent) and Germany (-7.8 per cent). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm by Barry Sookman
The Federal Court of Canada released a landmark decision finding that the court has the jurisdiction to make an extra-territorial order with world-wide effects against a foreign resident requiring the foreign person to remove documents containing personal information about a Canadian citizen that violates the person’s rights under Canada’s privacy law, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). [read post]