Search for: "Free Speech" Results 81 - 100 of 36,805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Scott Kominers should have been excluded.[36] Following the filing of the opening brief, a coalition led by art collective MSCHF filed an amicus brief in support of Rothschild.[37] The coalition includes CTHDRL, a digital design and experience studio, artists Alfred Steiner and Jack Butcher, and the free-speech advocacy group Author’s Alliance. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
” The right to assemble peacefully is related to the Free Speech Clause. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
” “As to Correll’s primary argument, in particular, that his suspension violates his First Amendment rights to free speech and association… Correll was not disciplined — his license was not suspended — on the basis of the content of his speech, but rather on the basis that in representing private parties before the USPTO, he violated certain of the USPTO’s disciplinary rules. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:30 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Similar encampments sprouted up elsewhere, leading universities to struggle with where to draw the line between allowing free expression while maintaining safe and inclusive campuses. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
The acts that can give rise to a Section 1983 claim are varied and can include police brutality, excessive force, violations of freedom of speech or assembly, unreasonable search and seizure, excessive bail, racial profiling, and more. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
The acts that can give rise to a Section 1983 claim are varied and can include police brutality, excessive force, violations of freedom of speech or assembly, unreasonable search and seizure, excessive bail, racial profiling, and more. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
The acts that can give rise to a Section 1983 claim are varied and can include police brutality, excessive force, violations of freedom of speech or assembly, unreasonable search and seizure, excessive bail, racial profiling, and more. [read post]
7 May 2024, 4:30 am by jonathanturley
Even the dean of its leading journalism school has warned against the “weaponization of free speech. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:30 am by Steve Gottlieb
The fact that they depend on words is not a get out of jail free card to libel, defraud, misrepresent, threaten or intimidate others, ignore required notices and disclosures, or to ignore rules designed to protect jurors. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:15 am by Josh Richman
They didn't know about refreshable Braille users or users that might have another way to use VoiceOver that didn't involve speech out loud. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:05 pm by News Desk
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.) [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:39 pm by Immigration Prof
The USCIS SEVIS Data Mapping Tool identifies international student populations in the U.S.; This map uses April 2024 data. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:54 am by Eugene Volokh
As I've mentioned before, there is no free speech right to camp out on university property in contravention of content-neutral restrictions on such camping, whether it's at a private university or a public one.The post MIT President Says MIT Is Finally Shutting Down Anti-Israel Encampment appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:56 am
He doesn't want to go to jail, but at the end of the day....And here's Alan Dershowitz,  yesterday, denouncing the judge for not understanding free speech law and imposing a prior restraint:A Gag Order = Prior Restraint#law #lawyer #news #trending #trump #biden #shorts #Elections2024 pic.twitter.com/5B3Q5NWGY4— Alan Dershowitz (@AlanDersh) May 5, 2024 [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:45 am by David Pozen
To simplify somewhat, we might say that professors are granted a number of basic rights within the university, including rights to free speech and due process and quasi-property rights in the job itself. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:57 am by Jenny Domino
Human Rights Committee has affirmed that “free communication of information and ideas about public and political issues between citizens, candidates and elected representatives is essential,” (General Comment No. 34, para. 13). [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:35 am
Meanwhile, Biden is the one whose mind is slowing and who garbles his speech, fails to keep his talking points straight, and wanders into puzzling personal anecdotes. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Then Biden tried to balance respecting free speech and protecting against disruption. [read post]