Search for: "Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc."
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Quicken Loans, Inc., including the prospect that the decision “could encourage the practice of ‘marking up’ fees by mortgage lenders, escrow officers and others that had been banned by federal regulators for the last decade.” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represented the petitioners in Freeman, but the author of this post was not involved in the case.] [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:18 pm
Quicken Loans, Inc., No. 10-1042 (U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:13 am
Quicken Loans Inc. (10-1042) and Taniguchi v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Quicken Loans, Inc. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am
Quicken Loans and Faculty Senate v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm
Quicken Loans, Inc., and rejected pleas to legislative interpretation, enforcement discretion, and an old policy by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Quicken Loans, Inc. for this blog. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:19 pm
In one of the RESPA cases, Freeman v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
In the case of Freeman v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
Quicken Loans, Inc., in which the Court held that unearned fees – fees for which lenders do not provide any services – violate federal law only if the fees are split between two companies. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
Quicken Loans, Inc., which has its origins in the mortgages that a group of homeowners obtained from Quicken. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
In Freeman v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
In Freeman v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:00 pm
“ As we have previously covered, in Freeman, et al. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:01 pm
” As we have previously covered, in Freeman, et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 10:24 am
Those cases are Freeman, et al., v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Quicken Loans Inc. [read post]
