Search for: "Frito Lay, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2015, 3:44 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., 114 USPQ2d 1827 (Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:00 am
Frito-Lay, Inc., 978 F.2d 1093, 1096 (9th Cir. 1992) [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:40 am by Steve Baird
If the TTAB takes the same amount of time in deciding where “pretzel crisps” falls on the Spectrum of Distinctiveness, it will be July before we know the answer, but something tells me the TTAB’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
An exception is Waits v Frito Lay, 978 F. 2d 1093 (9thCir. 1992). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Hospira, and how the inventors were found to have intentionally decided not to submit two material pieces of prior art to the PTO. 5) IP Kat: Patents and jurisdiction 2: Innovia v Frito-Lay - This post analyzes the question of which court Europeans can bring their patent related claims. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Hospira, and how the inventors were found to have intentionally decided not to submit two material pieces of prior art to the PTO. 5) IP Kat: Patents and jurisdiction 2: Innovia v Frito-Lay - This post analyzes the question of which court Europeans can bring their patent related claims. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:39 pm by Lara
Frito-Lay sued for being greasy. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 8:13 am by Frederick Lah
Just last week, Frito-Lay was hit with a class action complaint in Florida district court, alleging that the company deceptively marketed its bean dip as "all natural" when it actually contained genetically modified organisms. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 8:13 am by Frederick Lah
Just last week, Frito-Lay was hit with a class action complaint in Florida district court, alleging that the company deceptively marketed its bean dip as "all natural" when it actually contained genetically modified organisms. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:19 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) Public Trustee v Butler & Anor [2012] EWHC 858 (Ch) (03 April 2012) DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail) Ltd [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch) (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) J Preston & Sons Ltd [2012] EWHC 870 (QB) (03 April 2012) Letts v Royal Sun Alliance Plc [2012] EWHC 875 (QB) (03 April 2012) The Serious Organised Crime Agency v Robb [2012] EWHC 803 (QB) (30 March 2012) Sharif, R. v [2012] EWHC 868 (QB) (03 April 2012) Dr A v HTX… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 3:32 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., 2021 U.S.P.Q.2d 318 (4th Cir. 2021).A party seeking review of a TTAB decision may appeal to the CAFC under Section 1071(a) or seek de novo review in a U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:29 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., 2019 USPQ2d 401574 (W.D.N.C. 2019).The court observed that it must dismiss an action under FRCP 12(b)(3) if it determines at any time that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:55 am
Frito-Lay, 124 USPQ2d at 1196 (citing Hunt Masters, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
The Board found that Frito-Lay had proven by a preponderance of the evidence that PRETZEL CRISPS is generic for “pretzel crackers. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 10:01 am
Frito-Lay, Inc., 165 F.3d 460, 467 (6th Cir. 1999) (reaching same conclusion without analysis); Newberry v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:32 am
If you want to follow this event, it's Eolas Technologies Inc. v Adobe Systems Inc., et al., No. 6:09-cv-446. [read post]