Search for: "G Lambert"
Results 1 - 20
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
What’s more, Section 6(g) rules raise serious questions under the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
Recently, the judge in Sandoz v BMS ([2023] EWCA Civ 472) interpreted G2/21 as being close to an ab initio plausibility standard in line with the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
The judge thus considered under sufficiency whether it was "plausible" that substantially all compounds following under the claim would have the technical effect of reducing the effects of food.The UK ab initio plausibility test On "plausibility", the judge considered the Supreme Court decision in Warner Lambert as requiring there to be "some reasons for supposing" that a claimed invention has its purported technical effect (para. 226). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
By Filip Radzikowski Fractionalized ownership is not a novel idea. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm
Greg Lambert 0:58 All right. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
” Following those judgments, Teva informed Grünenthal it intended to include its generic Teva Testosterone in the Dutch Taxe (G-Standaard) for October 2023 (deadline to submit: 13 September). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:52 am
Greg Lambert 0:14 And I’m Greg Lambert. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 5:58 am
In Part 2, she focused on the EPO decision in G 2/21, and the way the Court of Appeal sought to reconcile that decision with Warner-Lambert. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
In Sandoz v BMS, Arnold LJ considered G 2/21 in the context of the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:42 am
The Court of Appeal in Sandoz v BMS attempts to reconcile the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) decision in G 2/21, and the landmark UK Supreme Court decision on plausibility Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:53 am
Greg Lambert 0:15 And I’m Greg Lambert. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am
G 2/21 The Court of Appeal provided some interesting obiter observations on the EBA’s decision in G 2/21: First, Lord Justice Arnold opined that the majority approach in Warner-Lambert corresponds to the “ab initio plausibility” test identified in the referral decision underlying G 2/21 (T 116/18 Sumitomo), whereas that of the minority corresponds to the “ab initio implausibility” test. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we address the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:50 am
Fig. 3: Plausibility reaches the UK Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd While Warner Lambert was a decision made in the context of a second medical use claim, this Case Law was soon also applied to product claims in the UK. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 8:55 am
Greg Lambert 0:13 And I’m Greg Lambert. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:32 pm
I’m Greg Lambert. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 11:58 am
I’m Marlene Gebauer, Greg Lambert 0:24 And I’m Greg Lambert. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm
Stan Lee went back and this was I think we’d mentioned it in early episodes of this show that he went in and created G Hulk and it was actually one of the last comic books that he actually wrote. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:07 am
The difference between plausibility and lack of implausibility was also explored in Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56 (IPKat). [read post]
