Search for: "G.L. " Results 121 - 140 of 545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 1:22 pm by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
Thus, in order to avoid the risk of deportation our client needs pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 Section 87 or an acquittal. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:22 pm by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
Thus, in order to avoid the risk of deportation our client needs pretrial probation under G.L. c. 276 Section 87 or an acquittal. [read post]
21 May 2017, 6:44 am by Daniel Cappetta
Morgan, the SJC ruled that “the pretrial diversion statute [G.L. c.276A], as amended by the VALOR Act in 2012, permits a judge to continue without a finding (CWOF) or to dismiss a charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs (OUI), second or subsequent offense, notwithstanding the provisions of G.L. c.90, §24, which generally proscribe such dispositions. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 7:10 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
The trial court agreed with the estate’s argument that this fell under the exception found in G.L. c. 258 § 10(j), which states that sovereign immunity does not apply when there is negligent maintenance of public property. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:37 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
 This is in accordance with Massachusetts’ worker’s compensation law, specifically, G.L. c. 152 § 1(7A), which holds that personal injuries include mental disability when they have been predominantly caused by a work-related event. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Heidi A. Nadel
ShaveLogic counterclaimed, alleging that Gillette filed its lawsuit in bad faith.Gillette moved to dismiss, arguing that its filing of the lawsuit was petitioning activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, G.L. c. 231, section 59H, and was protected by the litigation privilege. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Gillette alleged that the former employees misappropriate trade secrets and other confidential information to develop a wet-shaving razor for the benefit of their new employer, ShaveLogic.ShaveLogic counterclaimed, alleging that Gillette filed its lawsuit in bad faith.Gillette moved to dismiss, arguing that its filing of the lawsuit was petitioning activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, G.L. c. 231, section 59H, and was protected by the litigation privilege. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:23 am by Heidi A. Nadel
ShaveLogic counterclaimed, alleging that Gillette filed its lawsuit in bad faith.Gillette moved to dismiss, arguing that its filing of the lawsuit was petitioning activity protected by the anti-SLAPP statute, G.L. c. 231, section 59H, and was protected by the litigation privilege. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:27 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
French, SJC -12012 the defendant was convicted of breaking and entering, G.L. c. 266 Section 18 and larceny over $250, G.L. c. 266 Section 30. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:27 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
French, SJC -12012 the defendant was convicted of breaking and entering, G.L. c. 266 Section 18 and larceny over $250, G.L. c. 266 Section 30. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:28 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
  The lender had used a standard contract to issue the mortgages, which did not explicitly incorporate the statutory power of sale under G.L. c. 183, § 21. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 10:51 am by Ian Patterson
In resolving the case, the ASBCA turned to the longstanding contracting doctrine first developed in G.L Christian & Associates v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:38 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
Open and Gross Lewdness Open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior in Massachusetts is a crime under G.L. c. 272 Section 16. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:38 am by Stephen Neyman, P.C.
Open and Gross Lewdness Open and gross lewdness and lascivious behavior in Massachusetts is a crime under G.L. c. 272 Section 16. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 6:34 am by Daniel Cappetta
” The Court also rejected the defendant’s contention that G.L. c.276, §87A, “provide[s] [a] statutory basis for the return of probation fees where a defendant’s conviction is subsequently vacated. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 6:34 am by Daniel Cappetta
” The Court also rejected the defendant’s contention that G.L. c.276, §87A, “provide[s] [a] statutory basis for the return of probation fees where a defendant’s conviction is subsequently vacated. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The plaintiffs are mothers of children where guardians have been appointed pursuant to G.L. c. 190B, Sec. 5-206. [read post]