Search for: "GENERAL MOTORS, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 2,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 12:30 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
The company, which transports marijuana for dispensaries and growers, had argued that the drivers were exempted from the overtime provisions of the FLSA under that law’s exemption covering a motor carrier’s employees who are engaged in duties that affect the safety of vehicles operated in interstate commerce. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Rivian, Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co. are among the carmakers adopting Tesla’s charging connectors for their battery-powered cars, giving thousands of customers access to the Tesla charging network. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
I will lose the opportunity to bill for services in this case and in others (although I generally donate most fees related to courtroom testimony to charitable organizations, the lack of opportunity to do so is an injury to me). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
All three judges agreed that TBP's actions weren't protected by the First Amendment, relying on The Bail Project, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 4:42 pm by Donald Clarke
Can China prohibit General Motors, which does business in China, from selling its Brazilian subsidiary? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm by Allyson Smith
In 1980, she established Wexler & Walker Public Policy Associates, which took on clients such as General Motors and worked with the Australian government. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Fischbarg, 9 NY3d at 377; see generally Eberhardt v G & J Contr., Inc., 188 AD3d 1653, 1654 [4th Dept 2020]; Peters v Peters, 101 AD3d 403, 403-404 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
General Motors Corp., 141 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 1998) (disallowing opinion of expert witness, who “lacked any scientific basis for an opinion about … motives,” about defendant’s failure to add safety measure in order to “save money”); In re Diet Drugs Prods. [read post]