Search for: "GEORGIA-PACIFIC, LLC"
Results 81 - 100
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
Reasonable royalty analysis (Georgia-Pacific factors) Lucent v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am
” At Power Line, John Hinderaker discusses the cert. petition in Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Pacific Shores Properties, LLC 14-56Issue: Whether a disparate-treatment claim under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionPetitioners' reply Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation CVSG Information:Invited: December 12, 2011 Decker v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
Realty, LLC, 22 NY3d 762 (2014); Sean Reeps. v BMW of North Am., LLC, 26 N.Y.3d 801 (2016). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Amicus brief of the Mountain States Legal Foundation Reply of petitionersSupplemental brief of respondentSupplemental brief of petitionersCVSG Information:Invited: December 12, 2011Filed: May 24, 2012 (Deny) Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Amicus brief of the Mountain States Legal Foundation Reply of petitionersSupplemental brief of respondentSupplemental brief of petitionersCVSG Information:Invited: December 12, 2011Filed: May 24, 2012 (Deny) Georgia-Pacific West, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Georgia-Pacific, LLC, 211 So. 3d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, No. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:16 am
Georgia-Pacific LLC, 2013 WL 2435565, 2013 NY Slip Op 04127 (June 6, 2013), aff’d, 2013 WL 2435565 (N.Y. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:46 pm
Reynolds Consumer Products, LLC. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:45 am
Georgia-Pacific LLC, --- F. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
AOL, LLC (Gray on Claims) CAFC orders en banc rehearing of Akamai joint infringement claim: Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
The royalty amount assumes that the party would still be able to make a reasonable profit by selling the article in the open market.[5] Generally, the determination of a reasonable royalty for accused patent infringement applies the well-established factors set forth in Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 10:25 am
Georgia-Pacific LLC, 2013 WL 2435565, 2013 NY Slip Op 04127 (June 6, 2013). [1] See, e.g., Simmons v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:36 am
The affected products were distributed to the District of Columbia and 36 states, including Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and West… [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am
In a line of decisions, however, going back perhaps as far as Union Pacific R. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
The Lucent court criticized the lack of evidence regarding several other Georgia-Pacific factors, including Factor No. 10, related to the benefits of the invention, Factor No. 11, related to the extent of use of the invention by the accused infringer, and Factor No. 13, related to the portion of profit that should be attributed to the invention as opposed to contributions made by the accused infringer. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Georgia)Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Innocence ProjectReply brief The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of March 25. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
” We expect that this proposed reform bill will not alter the traditional role of the Georgia-Pacific factors, which have been used in the reasonable royalty analysis, or other established damages law. [read post]
