Search for: "GEORGIA-PACIFIC"
Results 121 - 140
of 902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
“The Issue with Tissue” reveals Procter & Gamble, Kimberly-Clark, and Georgia-Pacific use zero recycled content in their at-home toilet paper, instead relying on ancient trees clear-cut from the Canadian boreal forest (the “Amazon of the North”). [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
In Georgia-Pacific v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 1:20 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, 349 S.C. 251, 562 S.E.2d 633 (2002),the South Carolina Supreme Court held that a developer has a duty to ensure that the roads and other common areas are in good repair at the time ownership of the common areas are transferred to a property owner's association or to provide the association with sufficient funds to bring those common areas up to standard as of the date of the transfer. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:05 am
Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, decided by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, shows why. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 6:29 pm
Georgia–Pacific LLC. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:51 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals, Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 6:11 am
Jurors also found that four of the compound manufacturers, including Georgia-Pacific, share some of the responsibility for causing Aubin's illness. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm
The court adopted Georgia-Pacific, but not Google's denomination of it. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:37 am
Supreme Court to Address Causation Requirements in Asbestos Case -Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
Georgia Pacific Consumer Products LP v. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 11:24 am
Over the past few months, NAD has initiated inquiries into green claims made by Georgia-Pacific and Everlane. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
”), “there appears to be nothing in U.S. law that compels courts to utilize either the Georgia-Pacific framework, or patent damages law in general, to determine royalties complying with an SEP holder’s FRAND commitment”. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
In light of the liberal standard for the qualifications of experts enunciated by the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and the Federal Circuit’s approval of the methods used by damages experts to quantify the hypothetical negotiation, it appears that an appropriately credentialed individual on the issue of intellectual property damages may testify at trial as to application of the Georgia-Pacific factors, including the artificial hypothetical negotiation, despite a lack… [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
Even where the 25 percent rule is offered merely as a starting point to which the relevant factors for a reasonable royalty calculation found in Georgia-Pacific are then applied to adjust the rate, the taint of the 25 percent rule remains. . . . [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:15 am
: Statelessness in the United States and Lessons from the European Union," Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 43, no. 1 (2014) [full-text]Statelessness: Precarity or Potentiality, Thesis (University of the Witwatersrand, Feb. 2015) [text]Strategically Litigating Childhood Statelessness (ENS Blog, Sept. 2015) [text]"This is What Would Happen if We Repealed Birthright Citizenship," Mother Jones, 26 Aug. 2015 [text]Transnational Migrant Families, Child… [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:05 pm
The Court has reviewed [the expert's] opinion and his asserted bases for it and concludes he utilizes the proper methodology set forth in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:45 am
VirnetX argued the royalty rate should be trebled because of changed circumstances in light of the Georgia-Pacific factors and Apple's now willful infringement and because the bargaining positions of the parties would have dramatically shifted in favor of VirnetX. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:24 am
Plaintiff notes that [its own] expert report does not disclose the full terms or circumstances of the [agreement], and points out that the report states that [plaintiff's expert] was unable to draw any meaningful conclusions from [the agreement] under the Georgia-Pacific analysis. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:03 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued that day in a case captioned Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP v. von Drehle Corp. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:33 am
[His] opinion is, in essence, (i) the application of Georgia-Pacific factors, followed by (ii) the application of a 50/50 split, derived from the NBS. [read post]
