Search for: "GET BACK UP, INC." Results 101 - 120 of 5,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2009, 3:49 pm
Sharing Administrative Services, Part II: Joining Forces in the Back Office - Administrative Collaboration and Consolidation On June 3, 2009, The Chronicle of Philanthropy presented the webinar, "Joining Forces in the Back Office: How Collaboration Can Help Your Organization," moderated by Nicole Wallace, Senior Writer at The Chronicle of Philanthropy, with three panelists, Robert A. [read post]
30 May 2011, 7:42 am by David Feldman
 But in the Crumbs deal the shell sponsors gave up most of their carried interest, which helped get the deal approved. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, “Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin get you up to speed on the … case and discuss, among other things, whether it will turn into a ‘Travel Ban, Part Two. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:01 pm by Cathy Siegner
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.) [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:53 am by Theo Francis
Saylor, president, chairman and CEO of MicroStrategy Inc., a McLean, Va., firm that helps other companies analyze their data. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:55 am
Oftentimes, when the clock falls back, people are still waking up at the time their bodies are used to getting up. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:14 pm by Barry Barnett
When the auctions froze up in early 2008, the chumps who bought ARS couldn't get their money back. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 5:24 am by SHG
All of it messed up our ability to raise money for our work in this state. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 10:09 pm
It must be an agreement, between at least two parties, where each has committed to give up something in order to get something back, and everyone has agreed on the important terms. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:19 am
Back on August 14th, I commented on yet another decision giving a further boost to the Supreme Court's decision in Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc. v. [read post]