Search for: "GRANT THORNTON INTERNATIONAL, LIMITED"
Results 1 - 20
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
Celebrezze and related precedents, that Colorado lacked a sufficient basis for limiting the constitutional right of Trump supporters to cast their ballots for him—though even that would have raised tricky questions, as I noted here. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
In August 2022, Grant Thornton predicted India-UK bilateral trade to double by 2030, with India’s trade in goods and services with the UK increasing to $31.34 billion in 2022 from $19.51 billion in 2015. [4] Notably, there are mechanisms within the Indian Criminal Procedure which enable investigating agencies in India to obtain evidence from a foreign jurisdiction. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:31 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
In Meadows v Khan and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton, the Supreme Court set out a six-part test for determining a damages claim for the tort of negligence. [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:29 am
This guest post was written by Frank Hülsberg, who is a Chartered Accountant and Tax Advisor in Düsseldorf, Partner Advisory and Member of the Executive Board at Grant Thornton AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft in Germany, and Burkhard Fassbach, a D&O-lawyer in private practice in Germany. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 9:05 am
Thornton China Center at the Brookings Institution will host two online panel discussions that examine the evolution of norms in Chinese elite politics, predictions of the outcomes of the 20th Party Congress and what the future holds for Xi Jinping. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 1:05 pm
Agency for International Development. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider the limits to the principle (as espoused in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2018] UKSC 21) under which a solicitor can ask the Court to grant an equitable lien in order to protect his entitlement to fees as against his client. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
First, Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company of Hanover Limited. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020 Manchester Building Society (Appellant)… [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 11:30 am
Hanban additionally provided language teaching materials, if requested, and paid the salaries and international travel costs for the Mandarin language teachers from the Chinese partner university, as well as grants for research, study tours to China and other matters in some cases. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Mass Tort Cases In mass tort cases, many individual plaintiffs have typically sued a single or limited group of defendants. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 2:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020 Manchester Building Society (Appellant)… [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar… [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020 Takhar… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The appeal considered, first, whether Begum should be granted leave to enter the UK in order to pursue her appeal against the deprivation order. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor v Cambroe Estates Ltd… [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
On Monday 8 February, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company of Hanover Limited. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
The appeal will consider whether a date should have been included or excluded for the purposes of limitation and, consequently, whether the Appellants’ claim against the Respondents is time-barred. [read post]
