Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT"
Results 81 - 100
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 10:31 pm
Quicken Loans, Inc., and rejected pleas to legislative interpretation, enforcement discretion, and an old policy by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am
Prior to his current position, he states he was a Vice President in the Portfolio Retention Department at Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, and prior to that he says he was Vice President of Loan Services at World Savings Bank, FSB. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States Department of Interior (land into trust)Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 7:34 pm
Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) for failing to perform a contract the firm had with HUD “for the management and marketing of single family homes in Ohio and Michigan. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
Using grants from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the NHA provides rent subsidies and utility credits to low-income residents of its housing projects. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
After Mr Justice Vos gave judgment in United Air Lines Inc v United Airways Limited and United Airways Bangladesh Limited (unreported, but noted here by the IPKat), the good judge refused permission to appeal on the basis that this was about the most irresistible application for summary judgment for trade mark infringement and passing off as you could hope to find, even taking into account the defendants' submissions in their skeleton… [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 2:08 am
United States, et al.Court: U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 09-16362 November 23, 2011 Judge: Tallman Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Injury Law, Medical Malpractice, Military Law After his unsuccessful cataract surgery, plaintiff brought a claim for battery against the United States government and his United States Navy surgeon. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 11-94Issue(s): Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendment principles that this Court established in Apprendi v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:35 pm
Department of Housing and Urban Development (Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmIn re G.D.J. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:58 am
In 1988, Chuck purchased a small house, on Myrle Street, in Longview, Texas, from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in a discount auction for $13,200. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The United States did not. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Writ granted in partand denied in part.Law Offices of Moses S. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
He has also published articles on presidential approval ratings during foreign policy crises, Army efforts toward gender integration, and the experiences of Hispanics in the United States Army. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:18 pm
(d) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The EPA and health department had sued the companies, claiming the slag-dumping process at the mill violates the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
