Search for: "GREEN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 1 - 20 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
The solicitor general now seeks review, supported by the District of Columbia and 20 states, which have filed a friend-of-the-court brief. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
A federal judge agreed with Fischer, but the District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled the statute applies to “all forms of obstructive conduct. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by Scott Bomboy
But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution,” concluded a unanimous three-judge District of Columbia Circuit appeals court panel. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
” Caroline Russell, leader of the Green Party in the London Assembly, said that the report failed to account for the ethical issues of using live facial recognition technology. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Imagine, for example, Marjorie Taylor Greene as a district attorney, reviewing a speech by President Biden! [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Saraphin Dhanani
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
District of Columbia, 670 F.3d 1244 (D.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
That was before the Supreme Court recognized that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to gun ownership in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Law professor at Columbia Law School, Jamal Greene, wrote that the legal question the Court presented—whether the Colorado anti-discrimination law impermissibly forces the web designer “to speak or stay silent”—is “too broad. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Those investigations and prosecutions remain under the authority of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
District Court for the District of Columbia concluded that the measure was “arbitrary and capricious” and had been implemented in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]