Search for: "Garden Construction Co., Inc. v. the United States" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The court rejected defendants’ argument that dismissal was warranted because Moments had consumptive uses which, under United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
Regarding the application of “facilities” to unlined landfills, the court, relying on Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. [read post]
For more information and for a review of the latest changes to state laws, please check out Seyfarth Shaw’s 2019-2020 edition of its 50 State Desktop Reference. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:05 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
5896748 DRY EYE BOOT CAMP 5896727 TOPCURE 5896609 GUERRILLIGENCE 5896514 VORTEX 5896513 VELVET 5896511 SCARAB 5896464 REGUNALYS 5896152 5896147 5896113 R R 5896081 RICHMOND ROOSTERS 5896023 VANGUARD SYSTEM 5896022 VANGUARD SYSTEM 5896019 VANGUARD 5895856 LIVING IN YELLOW 5895513 WING & BUCK HUNT CLUB 5895497 HEARTLAND REMC 5895482 SYMPHONY 5895464 VACMAN VM GOVACMAN.COM 5895308 5895306 REAL ESTATE RECOVERY CAPITAL 5894985 GUIDE ADVOCATE PROTECT 5899114 WHOLISTIC DOCTORS UNITED… [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 2nd District.Contempt -- Where court had entered order requiring co-owner of condominium apartment to “vacate” the unit because her occupancy violated the fifty-five and older age restriction for residents, it was error to hold the co-owner in contempt for continuing to spend several hours a day at the unit for the purpose of remodeling and gardening and staying overnight on several occasions -- Court order… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm by Gene Quinn
On Friday, July 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]