Search for: "Gardner Denver" Results 81 - 100 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2009, 5:31 am
Sincerely, Alan Apter Duluth, MN Rebecca Ball Thompson, CT Michael Bennet Baltimore, MD Earlene Burney Clarksville, TN Sharon Caulder Chesterfield, SC Bill Collins Norwalk, CT Elizabeth Colloty Ridgefield, CT Linda Debenedictis Norwood, MA Ellen Delisio Middletown, CT Mathy Milling Downing Laytonsville, MD Vernon and Shawnna Gardner Lewellen, NE Lisa and Michael Gourley Valley, NE Steve Govoni Rowayton, CT Cindy and Bruce Gustafson Littleton, CO Leslie Haag Bacliffe, TX Donna Harnett… [read post]
17 May 2009, 4:11 pm
(Denver Post)Illinois resident Maria Hightower, a junior in paralegal studies at Southern Illinois University Carbonale, has received the Camille Hickman Scholarship, which is awarded to a student "who is succeeding despite personal challenges". [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
In response, the employer moved to compel arbitration.This 5 to 4 decision reversed the Second Circuit's decision that held that its decision in Alexander v Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:39 am
”  The Court’s decision in 14 Penn Plaza greatly narrowed (and may have effectively overruled) its decision in Gardner-Denver. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 12:10 pm
  "One need only read Gardner-Denver itself to know that it was not at all so narrowly reasoned," reprimanded Justice Souter. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 8:50 am
Gardner-Denver, 415 U.S. 36 (1974), the Court found that the provision at issue did not expressly require arbitration of a member’s statutory rights, so the employee could not be precluded from bringing statutory claims in a judicial forum. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:26 pm
Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36 (1974) and Gilmer v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:08 am
Gardner Denver, 415 U.S. 36 (1974), the Court held that an arbitration provision in a CBA does not preclude an employee from asserting a violation of Title VII in federal court effectively giving a plaintiff potentially two bites at the apple. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Gardner-Denver (1974) held that a CBA arbitration clause cannot waive an individual employee's right to litigate. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:07 pm
The Court did not overrule Gardner-Denver; rather, it distinguished it. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 10:20 am
Gardner Denver, 415 U.S. 36 (1974), the Court held that an arbitration provision in a CBA does not preclude an employee from asserting a violation of Title VII in federal court effectively giving a plaintiff potentially two... [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
  Both point to the fact that Congress chose not to overturn Gardner-Denver in the last 35 years, so this ruling is (in their view) contrary to Congressional intent. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:30 pm
  It's written by Patrick Doyle and Natasha Gardner. [read post]