Search for: "Gary Lawson"
Results 141 - 160
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
However, before doing so, I want to consider an argument to the contrary offered by serious scholars, not by the likes of former Professor Eastman.In a draft article first uploaded to SSRN in March and very recently updated, Boston University Law Professors Jack Beermann and Gary Lawson argue that the VP in fact plays a very substantial role in resolving a certain kind of dispute over the Electoral College. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:30 am
For the symposium on Ken Kersch, Conservatives and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Gary Lawson In my previous post on Ken Kersch’s Conservatives and the Constitution, I wrote about the book that Ken wrote. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm
Online 1 (2011); Gary Lawson & David B. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Calabresi & Gary Lawson, Why Robert Mueller's Appointment is Unlawful, 95 Notre Dame Law Review 87 (2019). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
(My friend Gary Lawson reaches his small-state constitutional commitments without relying on those predecessors, but there’s a reason why there’s an audience predisposed to like what he says.) [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
Proponents of originalism (Gary Lawson), common law practice (Philip Hamburger) and a traditional separation of powers (Jeremy Waldron), who insist that some institutional arrangement A is a priori legitimate all fall prey to Vermeule’s claim that institutional arrangement B, the contemporary administrative state, is as legitimate. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am
For instance, Gary Lawson argues that the Patent Office Director’s lack of final decision-making authority may raise a separate constitutional issue. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:20 am
It’s also worth noting that many leading constitutional federalism scholars believe that the law is unconstitutional, including Gary Lawson (one of the top experts on the Necessary and Proper Clause), Steve Calabresi (who is one of the legal scholars who signed on to the amicus brief I wrote for the Washington Legal Foundation), Richard Epstein, and, of course, co-blogger Randy Barnett. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 10:45 am
In the academic world, it has come under from challenge from two generations of conservative and libertarian federalism scholars, including Steven Calabresi, Lynn Baker, Gary Lawson, and the Volokh Conspiracy’s own Randy Barnett, among others. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 8:54 pm
Part of it was the prof I had (Gary Lawson, who is now at Boston U.), and part perhaps because I had very, very low expectations going in. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:10 am
The VC also helped highlight anti-mandate arguments developed by other leading scholars such as Gary Lawson and Richard Epstein. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
The brief signers include VC co-conspirators Jonathan Adler, David Kopel, and Todd Zywicki, along with other well-known constitutional law scholars such as James Ely (Vanderbilt), Kurt Lash (University of Illinois), Gary Lawson (BU), Steven Presser (Northwestern), and others. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
Scholars such as Gary Lawson have developed theories of the original meaning of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
Calabresi and Gary S. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
As I have shown, both of these theories were nurtured and developed in the Reagan administration as part of their longer term agenda to take back control of the law.[7] Speaking of hiding in plain sight, the two “leading academic conservatives” Professor Tushnet cites to illustrate how “Bannon’s” political program to “deconstruct[] the administrative state” is translated into a legal or constitutional agenda, are in fact two Reagan era alumni who also happen… [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
Along the way, he also delivers quite devastating critiques of three prominent defenders of what might be termed the “old order” of critics of the administrative state, Jeremy Waldron, Philip Hamburger, and Gary Lawson. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
As an originalist more faint-hearted than, say, Gary Lawson, I am troubled by that question as a matter of high level theory, but most of my academic work on the matter assumes a baseline of substantial delegation to federal agencies. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
" The phrase "original public meaning" seems to have entered into the contemporary theoretical debates in the work of Gary Lawson with Steven Calabresi as another "early adopter. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
” The phrase “original public meaning” seems to have entered into the contemporary theoretical debates in the work of Gary Lawson with Steven Calabresi as another “early adopter. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
” The phrase “original public meaning” seems to have entered into the contemporary theoretical debates in the work of Gary Lawson with Steven Calabresi as another “early adopter. [read post]
