Search for: "Gau" Results 1 - 20 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2024, 5:08 am by David Pocklington
” The Petitioners’ position was summarized by Mr Gau in his written submission at [22]. i.e. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:28 am by David Pocklington
Paul Pettistree [2023] ECC SEI 3 Gau Ch. prefaced his Judgment: “[1]. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:07 am by David Pocklington
They are to be commended for their tenacity and thoughtfulness,” Gau Ch. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 2:23 am by David Pocklington
In response to a paragraph the Statement of Need  [7], not drafted by the petitioner but expressing the collective view of the PCC, Gau Ch. explained the test for granting a faculty: “[8]. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 12:22 am by David Pocklington
Noting that the case, as a whole, was not straightforward [14], Gau Ch. considered its different elements: the extension, [16]; the heating, [17]; and the pews, [18]. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 11:23 pm by David Pocklington
Gau Ch. agreed to grant a faculty for the works subject to conditions which included that the plaques were to be reinstated in positions to be agreed with the objector. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
  In his review of the case law, Re St Margaret, Rottingdean (No 2) [2021] ECC Chi 1; Re Jesus College Cambridge [2022] ECC Ely 1; and In the Matter of Dorchester, St Peter, Holy Trinity and All Saints, [2022] ECC Sal 4, Gau Ch observed that it was clear from the diversity of decisions in these cases that any grant of a faculty was fact-specific; the test that he had to apply is set out in Re St Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158 together with the… [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
The Church building and the Statement of needs Gau Ch. noted and reaffirmed his description of the church in Re St. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 1:55 pm by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
”  …In California, “the employer’s burden is satisfied by authorizing and permitting employees to take meal and rest breaks,” which must be within the first five hours of a work shift, Gaus said. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction How should citizens in a modern pluralist democracy debate and discuss public affairs? [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Our selection of some of the more interesting consistory court cases over the past year The post Law & religion in the UK courts 2022 highlights some of the most significant UK religion cases in the secular courts over the past year. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during November 2022 (II) Seventeen consistory court judgments were circulated in November, and the eight featured in this first part of the round-up all relate to Reordering, extensions and other building works. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 12:45 am by David Pocklington
Gau Ch. indicated his concern that the pews had been stored “on end behind the organ”, a method of storage which had already caused damage to some of the pews [3]. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 12:56 am by Frank Cranmer
In Re St Peter Sibton [2022] ECC SEI 3, Gau Ch observed: “I note that the petitioners refer to shortened pews as ‘pewlets’”. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Gau Ch. expressed his concerns on the cost of this very ambitious petition and required that the DAC should approve the proposed seating, and that the works should not proceed until all the funding was in place [16]. [read post]
30 May 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during May 2022 Ten consistory court judgments were circulated in May, and those featured in this round-up relate to: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Privy Council Business,  and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
29 May 2022, 1:02 am by Frank Cranmer
Consistory courts – a cautionary note In Re St Gregory Sudbury [2022] ECC SEI 2, Gau Ch commenced his judgment with advice to the Petitioners which is likely to be of general applicability: “[1]. [read post]