Search for: "Geico General Insurance Co" Results 81 - 100 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In response, Vough took a middle position and ruled that the "plaintiff is limited to informing the jury that he had an underinsured policy with defendant GEICO Insurance Co. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 6:52 pm by Law Lady
Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the exclusion of an insurance consultant's expert testimony from a suit against Geico Indemnity Co., finding that Florida juries do not need experts to determine if an insurance company has acted in bad faith. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:04 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  SOURCE: HOUSTON COURT OF APPEALS – 14TH DISTRICT - 14-11-00049-CV – 1/5/12  Appellant GEICO General Insurance Company challenges the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Austin Power on a breach of contract claim relating to an insurer’s duty to defend. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Specifically, plaintiff asserted that the Village Zoning law, Chapter IX, Section E was void for vagueness and that the Village Defendants violated his substantive due process rights by denying him a CO. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:30 am
The plaintiff, Steven Greenberger, brought a class action against GEICO General Insurance Co., in state court alleging breach of contract, consumer fraud in violation of 815 Ill. [read post]
26 May 2011, 8:00 pm by John Ottaviani
In 2009, a woman (who subsequently married the plaintiff) purchased automobile insurance coverage online at GEICO’s website. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:29 am by Antitrust Today
The defendants include State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Geico General Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, and Allstate Insurance. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:49 am
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 314 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), where no support is to be found. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
GEICO General Insurance Co., slip op., No. 09-1603 (7th Cir., Jan. 10, 2011) (Sykes, J.), so I thought it was worthy of a summary. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Harleysville Insurance Co. that an insurance company was required to prove prejudice relative to a late reporting to a carrier in order to support a denial of uninsured motorists benefits to its insured. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Harleysville Insurance Co. that an insurance company was required to prove prejudice relative to a late reporting to a carrier in order to support a denial of uninsured motorists benefits to its insured. [read post]