Search for: "General Employment Enterprises, Inc."
Results 161 - 180
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
Under the Civil Rights Act, the obligation to provide religious accommodation generally applies unless the employer demonstrate that the accommodation of the employee’s religious beliefs or practices would cause undue hardship to the employer. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 3:45 am
The EEOC invoked this principle in EEOC v Papin Enterprises, Inc (MDFla, April 7, 2009), a case involving a franchise employee who sought exemption on religious grounds form a third-party corporation’s dress code that applied to all franchises. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
Inc., v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
Costa nor his employer, Nestlé Enterprises S.A., is a party to the lawsuit. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
The court in Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:37 pm
” See Hoffmann-LaRoche Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co., Inc., 325 U.S. 419, 424–25 (1945); 29 C.F.R. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:31 am
Moreover, the employer was required to present evidence that its waiters received notice of the tip credit in order to defeat the Secretary’s motion for summary judgment on this issue (Perez v Lorraine Enterprises, Inc dba Piccolo e Posto, October 1, 2014, Selya, B). [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:05 am
Da Pau Enterprises, Inc., the only remaining defendant after other parties reached settlements, moved to dismiss and/or for summary judgment against the association, alleging that the ten-year statute of repose period expired three days prior to the date the litigation commenced. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:12 pm
Equilon Enterprises, 23 Cal. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 3:40 pm
Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 68. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
A holding that the three corporations at issue here--Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., Mardel, Inc., and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Conestoga Wood Specialties, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:06 am
Following Wilander, SCOTUS addressed seaman status again in 1995 in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:06 am
Following Wilander, SCOTUS addressed seaman status again in 1995 in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:45 pm
He alleged that he was misclassified as an exempt employee while working for Skyriver Communications, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:38 pm
In Veco, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In MMM Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm
• Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
