Search for: "Gil v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2021, 6:45 pm
  This post includes that intiial address in the original Spanish with a crude English translation, along with brief reflections on the state of Caribbean Marxism (considered in more detail here) in Cuba and its potential future course. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 1:06 pm by Joshua A. Stein and Shira M. Blank
After keeping us waiting with baited breath for several years, the Eleventh Circuit finally broke its silence – issuing its long-anticipated ruling in Gil v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:26 pm
  The Cuban government announced, as is its habit now, through the show "Mesa Redonda", a set of potentially far ranging reforms of the non state sector and its regulation. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Tirant has distinguished itself by publishing state-of-the-art books that explore deficiencies and challenges of contemporary law, as well as updated manuals and textbooks adapted to the digital teaching environment.In 2018, Tirant started a book series on the Legal History of Latin America, aimed to serve as a convergence point of the diverse legal historiographies of the region, as well as a publishing platform for the best and newest studies in the field. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm by Richard Hunt
Judge Bloom isn’t jumping to any such conclusions because one issue in the Gil v Winn-Dixie appeal is whether the ADA ever applies to websites. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:11 am by JR Chaves
Sin embargo, la citada sentencia ha provocado el alboroto entre los operadores judiciales ( natural júbilo entre abogados y natural preocupación entre jueces) porque abre la vía a que se cuestione toda sanción enjuiciada en única instancia por una Sala del TSJ o de AN, y que pueda dar paso a nuevas sentencias ante el TEDH. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
Gil v London Borough of Camden (2020) EWHC 735 (QB) This was an application for permission to appeal the dismissal of a s.204 appeal for being out of time. [read post]