Search for: "Godaddy.Com, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2023, 12:29 pm
</span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <br/> </span> </p> <p> <span style="display: initial;"> <span style="display: initial;"> Famous trademark infringement </span> </span> <a href="https://www.business.com/articles/5-trademark-cases-and-what-you-should-learn-from-them/"… [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
Until recently, the Ninth Circuit had not decided whether to extend the protections of section 230 immunity to a website domain registrar such as GoDaddy.com. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It is further ordered that the intemet website hosting company GoDaddy.com and/or any other internet service that "hosts" Defendant Darrell Archer's website timothykassouni.com {including Amazon Technologies, Inc.}, take down and remove that website within three days of receiving notice of this order …. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am by MOTP
Texas Supreme Court continues to exempt an entire industry (the legal profession) from civil liability; lets attorneys and law firms profit from lawsuits brought to hold them accountable for wrongdoing. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1193 (11th Cir. 2001) (quoting Tally-Ho, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Plaintiff may serve subpoenas on GoDaddy.com, LLC, Wild West Domains, LLC, Enom, Inc., Domains By Proxy, LLC, Webair Internet Development, Inc., and Google, Inc. for the limited purpose of identifying the Doe Defendants and Roe Corporation Defendants in this case. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:32 am
CAPS also contacted GoDaddy.com and other website-hosting companies asserting that CAPS' intellectual property had been infringed. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:55 am by Ron Coleman
GoDaddy.com, Inc., the Ninth Circuit decision that held there is no cause of action for contributory cybersquatting under the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), which was passed as an amendment to the Lanham Act in 1999. [read post]