Search for: "Government Employees Insurance CO." Results 21 - 40 of 2,599
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2008, 7:05 am
AUTO - UM - TIMELY APPLICATION TO STAY OF ARBITRATION - CHOICE OF LAW - FRAMED ISSUE HEARINGMatter of Government Employees Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Phil Dixon
When and how can state and local government officials and employees record government meetings or their interactions with citizens? [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
“The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program provides health insurance to federal employees, retirees, and their dependents. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 7:44 am by David Adelstein
Government Employees Insurance Company, 2021 WL 4258821 (11th Cir. 2021) is a non-construction case that discusses the standard for pursuing a bad faith claim against an insurer. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:22 am by John Phillips
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., an employee had worked at a textile manufacturer and participated in a long-term group disability insurance plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:16 am by Robert Kraft
Co-insurance — This is the amount a consumer’s health insurer doesn’t cover in paying for medical bills. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 11:32 am by Clayton T. Osteen, Esq.
 While exclusionary clauses cannot be relied upon to create coverage, principles governing the construction of insurance contracts dictate that when analyzing an insurance policy the pertinent provisions should be read in pari materia. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 11:32 am by Clayton T. Osteen, Esq.
 While exclusionary clauses cannot be relied upon to create coverage, principles governing the construction of insurance contracts dictate that when analyzing an insurance policy the pertinent provisions should be read in pari materia. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Other decisions involving an employer’s use of electronic equipment underlying  disciplinary action being taken against the employee include: Fraser v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:16 am by Marcia Greenberger
In a concurring opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated that “the mandate serves the Government’s compelling interest in providing insurance coverage that is necessary to protect the health of female employees, coverage that is significantly more costly than for a male employee. [read post]