Search for: "Grant v. Target Corporation et al" Results 21 - 40 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The proposal would also require the disclosure of Scope 3 emissions if they are material or if the company has a target or goal related to Scope 3. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  These companies have historically been considered attractive targets for securities actions given the inherent risks of the industry and the volatility of their stock prices, and, as a result, often have relatively limited D&O insurance options. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
ClientEarth alleges several “serious shortcomings” in Shell’s strategy, including that the net zero emissions target is not reflected in Shell’s operating plans or budgets and the reduction targets do not involve reductions in absolute greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Summary Judgement was granted to the defendants in the case of Abulrazaq v The Trustees of the Exeter Mosque and Cultural centre [2021] EWHC 3252 (QB). [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
More specifically, the vastly differing rate at which developed and developing countries have been able to procure COVID-19 vaccines has exposed major inequities in global vaccine access, a major concern in light of high mortality rates in developing countries and the threats posed by deadly variants to countries even with high vaccination rates.[1] In an effort to boost developing countries access to COVID-19 vaccines, it has been proposed that the World Trade Organization (WTO) grant a… [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Wouter Vandenhole; and Jingjing Zhang Pursuant to the Section Registrar’s notification dated 25 March 2021 that the President of the Chamber (Fourth Section) had granted permission under Rule 44 § 5 of the Rules of the European Court of Human Rights   Duarte Agostinho and others v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
ReWalk Robotics Ltd., 973 F.3d 22, 32-33 (1st Cir. 2020) (affirming grant of motion to dismiss because the basis for the opinion statement was disclosed and there were no contrary, non-disclosed facts); Shreiber v. [read post]