Search for: "Grant v. Colvin" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2016, 8:24 pm by Sme
Kirby (10th Cir., October 7, 2016) (affirming grants of summary judgment in favor of Kirby and Comanche County on Tilghman's section 1983, sexual harassment, and retaliation)Labor Unions*Denton v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 9:15 pm by Sme
US Department of Labor (10th Cir., March 7, 2016) (denying BNSF's petition for review as regards the Federal Railroad Safety Act violation and the finding supporting the punitive-damages award, but granting the petition regarding the amount and constitutionality of the punitive-damages award)*Fernandez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 10:58 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., September 24, 2015) (reversing district court affirmation of the ALJ’s denial of social security benefits to Trujillo)Flowell Electric Association, Inc., v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 9:35 pm by Sme
Grant County, Oklahoma (10th Cir., November 27, 2015) (reversing the district court’s conclusion that the county was not Cink’s employer and therefore not liable under Cink’s age discrimination and disability claims)Miscellaneous*Sanders v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 9:28 pm by Sme
Bodycote International Aerospace (10th Cir., November 19, 2014) (affirming summary judgment below because Torres did not show any reversible error in the grant) Danny's Drywall v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:26 pm by Sme
State of Utah (Utah, May 18,2016) (declaring unconstitutional the Labor Commission's sliding fee schedule for attorneys representing injured workers because the Utah Constitution explicitly grants exclusive authority to govern the practice of law to the state supreme court, which "undoubtedly" covers the regulationof attorney fees)*Jones v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 7:47 am
The Indiana Supreme Court decision May 2nd in Ruth Mullins and Johnce Mullins, Jr. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Haim Abraham
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:14 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Errol Mendes has stated that parliamentary privilege already grants them the right to the documents. [read post]