Search for: "Green v. Morales" Results 41 - 60 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 1:00 am
As readers know, moral rights protection in the US is fairly narrow compared to European droit d’auteur jurisdictions. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm by Caroline Ncube
- Bernard Maister, Caspar van Woensel• Sport as a brand and its legal protection in South Africa - Owen Dean• Notes and updates• Comment on the Green Paper for post-school education and training - Shihaam Shaikh• Confusion and the bounds of trade mark monopolies: Foschini v Coetzee - Jeremy Speres• The panados and panadon’ts of trade mark registrations: recent developments regarding trademarks used in the pharmaceutical industry - Marius Roetz•… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:44 pm
Artisanal and small-scale mining in Liberia and Sierra Leone Irene Vélez-Torres & Diego Lugo-Vivas, Slow violence and corporate greening in the war on drugs in Colombia McKenzie F Johnson, Fighting for black stone: extractive conflict, institutional change and peacebuilding in Sierra Leone Tobias Ide, Lisa R Palmer, & Jon Barnett, Environmental peacebuilding from below: customary approaches in Timor-Leste Mirza Sadaqat Huda, An ecological response to… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:46 pm by Howard Friedman
"  RNS has an article entitled 5 faith facts on Trump’s Supreme Court pick, Neil Gorsuch.Here are religion cases in which Judge Gorsuch either wrote an opinion or served on the panel of the 10th Circuit which decided the case:⇾In Green v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am by Gary Nitzkin
In a recent opinion in Green v Ziegelman, 282 Mich App 292 (2009), the Michigan Court of Appeals took up the case of whether a creditor can pierce the corporate veil of a corporate creditor pursuant to the Proceedings Supplementary to Judgment Act and enter a judgment against the shareholder of that corporate judgment debtor. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:01 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And Robert George, in his excellent Making Men Moral, noted that there is a "pragmatic" strain even in classical Catholic thought that a political state should indeed move only with "all deliberate speed" when imposition of what is in fact the one true understanding of morality would generate too much resistance. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:31 am by Jon Sands
  In 2012, she was stopped by customs agents at LAX, and her green card was confiscated. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:35 pm by Nate Persily
Wade, her level of education, and her relative level of moral traditionalism. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am by Jeff Lipshaw
The chestnut case for the bucket game of "social change" and "commerce" is Dodge v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:12 am
Green, 275 F.3d 694, 698 n.3 (8th Cir. 2001) (quotation, alteration, and citation omitted). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:48 am by Steve Hall
The Court of Criminal Appeals opinion in Lykos v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
 Anyway this, Alberto's 56th weekly summary, reads as follows:* Green J quashes UK private copying regulationsA few weeks ago Green J issued a judgment concerning the recently-introduced UK exception for personal copies for private use, concluding that it does not currently envisage a fair compensation requirement [here]. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:54 pm
Green, first requiring the plaintiff to establish, by a preponderance of evidence, a prima facie case of discrimination. [read post]