Search for: "H&H Residential, LLC "
Results 41 - 60
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
’ LVRC Holdings LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 4:50 pm
Superior Court Judge Frederick H. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Using an LLC? [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:26 am
SBAM Partners, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Background Betty James owned a piece of residential property on Belarbor Street in southeast Houston. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Administrative LawFederal administrative law / by Gary Lawson.Lawson, Gary, 1958-St. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
In-fill exemption properly applied to residential development even though density was below general plan standards. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:12 pm
Empire Szechuan Noodle H. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
After that bipartisan effort, the House followed suit, passing a resolution (H. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Approval by CPUC would result in a rate increase for residential customers of roughly 4.6% and Direct Access or CCAs at a rate of 5.7% respectively. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Background This is a residential construction dispute. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:40 pm
Background Land Resource LLC (LRC) built residential subdivisions in the southern U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
By William W. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
Tourtelot & Butler and Robert H. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385, 1391, 1400-1401 [major changes to approved missed-use development project as a result of changed real estate market conditions – including increase from 2.7 to more than 3.2 million total square feet, reduction of office/retail space, addition of residential component, and elimination of cultural component – did not transform it into “new project” requiring new EIR; court expressed that “changes in the size,… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
H-07-2565, 2008 WL 4240486, at *8-9 (S.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
The court did, however, hold that the receptor thresholds could be used under certain circumstances, consistent with the California Supreme Court’s ruling, such as: (1) when the effect is ‘exacerbated’ by the project; (2) when a lead agency wishes to use such information for its own evaluation purposes; and (3) for those certain projects specifically identified in CEQA that call for an analysis of impacts on future users (see airports (PRC § 21096), school construction… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
— William H. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
SETTLEMENTS Proposed CERCLA Section 122(h) Cost Recovery Settlement for the Kentucky Avenue Wellfield Superfund Site, Town of Horseheads and Village of Horseheads, Chemung County, NY. [read post]
