Search for: "H. W." Results 41 - 60 of 5,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 8:27 am by wadminw
Erscheint auf dem Würfel eine Zahl in dem von Ihnen gewählten Bereich, wird der Gewinn ausgezahlt. [read post]
Carpenter also responded to criticism on Facebook of his willingness to make the robocall despite its message not to vote, stating: I was told the recordings were going to be listened to, to show the effectiveness and w[h]ether or not they would be used in the future[.] [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 7:28 am by Alex Phipps
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on February 20, 2024. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The former president had not forgotten how Brandeis had humiliated him and his attorney general, George W. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
Dezember 2023, ähnlich wie während der COVID19-Pandemie, telefonisch krankschreiben lassen, sofern keine schweren Symptome auftreten und die Erkrankten der Arztpraxis bekannt sind. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
“[W]hether the court will be able to fashion a reasonable allocation of parental responsibilities between all parents if the relocation occurs. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
However, the court rejected this argument, stating that the statute in question, § 19-509(h)(1), explicitly refers to policies different in kind from primary policies. [read post]
The group had gone over 200 kilometres before arriving at Waitangi, where Rueben Tipari, the organizer, addressed the crowd, saying, “[w]e want our people to not just hīkoi together and then go home … back to our individual lives. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on January 6… [read post]