Search for: "HALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
§1983–commonly referred to as “Section 1983:” “Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action… [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 6:17 am
See Helicopteros Nacionales de Columbia, S.A. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
AL., 26A FEDERAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: EVIDENCE § 5679 (1st ed.) [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:39 am
Johnson & Johnson et al. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Goldberg et al. eds., 2011), Reference Area(KF8205.A2 I535 2011). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Texas, et al. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
Barzilay, Judge) SUMMARY: The action filed by Plaintiffs Salmon Spawning & Recovery Alliance et. al. against Defendant United States appears anew before the court on remand from the Federal Circuit. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
SMITH, ET AL. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Stone, et al., Constitutional Law (Aspen Law & Business, 4th ed., 2001): 331-419. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm
The District of Columbia federal courts are a frequent forum for litigating FDA issues, and they’ve been pretty friendly to the First Amendment so far.There’s also a helpful discussion of the issue in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Realty One Group, et al.[8], one of the defendants, Michael Nelson, posted 5 paragraphs of a Las Vegas Review-Journal article, titled “Program may level housing sale odds”, on his website. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Solum, District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
Grant et al, 2010 BCSC 682 the claim concerned alleged defamatory statements made by a police officer to the plaintiff’s employer stemming from [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
., several localities have banned the sale as well, as have Massachusetts and the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In Huras v Primerica Financial Services Limited[13]an agreement on settlement was reached which provided small compensation to each member of the large group of class members.[14] The settlement provided for additional compensation to be paid to the Ontario and British Columbia RPs – $3000 and $2000 respectively.[15] By way of contract, in Sutherland, Justice Winkler disallowed a claim where the RP sought compensation for work related to the administration of the… [read post]
