Search for: "HARRIS COHEN, an individual"
Results 61 - 80
of 236
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 8:17 am
California Justice Harry Blackmun authored a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Burger and Black. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
2018 was another busy busy year in the world of copyright, and a continuing global 'theme' was the ongoing battle between 'big tech' and 'big content', with the likes of Google and YouTube continuing to lobby extensively against planned reforms, bringing onboard (some) of the creative community - whilst the 'big content' (including film companies, music companies, the games sector and television) rolled out other creators - and finally seemed to be… [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am
In the wake of Michael Cohen’s sentencing earlier this month, Bob Bauer and Jurecic argued that Trump’s involvement in the campaign finance violations Cohen committed constitutes an impeachable offense. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am
It was Wednesday, so Jen Patja Howell shared this week’s episode of Rational Security, Tamara Cofman Wittes, Benjamin Wittes, Susan Hennessey and Shane Harris had a very legal and very cool chat about Michael Flynn, Michael Cohen and the tenuous political situation in Israel. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
He is a 1988 graduate of the Yale Law School and a former clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 11:29 am
Beschloss goes on to tell the stories of the seven individuals who have presided over America’s largest wars: James Madison and the War of 1812, James Polk and the Mexican-American War, William McKinley and the Spanish-American War, Woodrow Wilson and World War I, Franklin Roosevelt and World War II, Harry Truman and the Korean War and Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam War. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
This three-part series looks at intriguing constitutional questions raised by California’s statutory enactment of SB 826, which requires publicly held corporations with principal executive offices located in California to have a prescribed number of women on their boards of directors. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Maybe elevating each individual’s race and considering it sui generis makes it too salient, and thus too contentious. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
Harry asks point-blank. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 9:00 am
When Harry met Sally Harry met Sally because Harry had migraines, sinusitis, chronic fatigue or tiredness of unknown origin, depression or just an emotional heaviness, or maybe because he needed help with relationships, finances or his sex life. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 12:05 pm
Instead, they insisted that such discrimination is okay as long as defendants receive individualized hearings. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:25 am
Braverman, Harry. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:55 pm
When combined with other evidence, it is easy to see the president's Cohen-Manafort “flipping” discussion as an attempt to persuade Manafort not to cooperate with prosecutors. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
For the first time, the list is arranged by school, instead of individual users' last names. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
I cringe when I hear folks express a fear that a Supreme Court nominee is likely to “use his position as a judge to legislate from the bench. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Many of Kennedy’s biggest rulings derived from the idea that government actions cannot be grounded in hatred or animus towards individuals or groups. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Discretionary decisions by state and local governments concerning law enforcement policy often result in the release of potentially dangerous private individuals, and thus can often be said to be a “cause” (in a but-for causation sense) of any harm that such individuals later inflict on other private persons. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
In 2013, Harris fielded several complaints about Cohen’s teaching. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:00 am
In 2013, Harris fielded several complaints about Cohen’s teaching. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
As we wrote last fall, the lawsuit held the potential to decide whether Colorado’s public accommodations law—which prohibits covered persons from withholding goods, services, or facilities from an individual or group based on, among other things, sexual orientation—violates the First Amendment’s ban on compelled speech when the statute is applied against someone who refuses to create custom wedding cakes for same-sex wedding celebrations because doing so would… [read post]
