Search for: "HCA INCĀ " Results 41 - 60 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 3:53 am by Barry Eagar
 Rather, it must be an effect of such substance or quality that the method considered as a whole is proper subject matter for a patent.Cross references in Bazpat: http://bazpat.blogspot.com/search/label/Subject%20MatterSignificant cases cited:  Grant v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFCWelcome Real-Time SA v Catuity Inc [2001] FCA 445National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67 (The NRDC case)Commissioner of Patents v… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:28 pm
The acquisition of Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. from hospital operator HCA Inc. and its subsequent operation by Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., at the behest of the Hospital Authority of Albany–Dougherty County, were “authorized pursuant to a clearly articulated state policy to displace competition, the court held.Through the Hospital Authorities Law, the Georgia legislature clearly articulated a policy authorizing the displacement of competition. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 11:59 pm by Mark Summerfield
  These provisions apply particularly to regulated products, including  pharmaceuticals and biologics (a.k.a biopharmaceuticals).In this article I will look at three specific aspects of the TPP:the obligation to provide for adjustment of the patent term to compensate for ‘unreasonable delays’ in the grant of a patent, about which I expect Australia to do nothing; the obligation to provide for extensions of the term of patents relating to pharmaceutical products as compensation… [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:16 am by Brennan W. Bolt
"Ten HCA hospitals unionize in Florida" -- Nashville Business Journal Ten Florida hospitals owned by HCA Holdings Inc. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 12:24 am by Mark Summerfield
IP Australia has opened a consultation on proposed changes in examination practice in light of the High Court’s ruling in D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2015] HCA 35. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:14 pm by Mark Summerfield
  In particular, all seven High Court judges found that claims 1-3 of Myriad Genetics’ Australian patent no. 686004, each of which is directed to isolated nucleic acid molecules corresponding with the BRCA mutation associated with increased breast cancer risk, are invalid because they do not define a patent-eligible ‘manner of manufacture’ under Australian law: D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2015] HCA 35.In arriving at this ruling, the High Court has… [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Josh Wright
The justices today said they will hear the Federal Trade Commission’s appeal of a U.S. appellate court ruling that the proposed purchase of HCA Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2006, 8:12 am
The following are the complaint, docket sheet, TRO motion, and proposed TRO disposition in this case. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Robert Kraft
The Wall Street Journal reports that HCA Holdings, Inc., a large for-profit hospital network including 160 hospitals, 115 surgery centers, and spanning 20 states, has prohibited use of power morcellation in laparoscopic uterine surgery, according to an email from a spokesperson on Tuesday. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:11 pm by Jeanne Huang
By Poomintr Sooksripaisarnkit Lecturer in Maritime Law, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania Introduction On 14th February 2024, the High Court of Australia handed down its judgment in Carmichael Rail Network Pty Ltd v BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co KG [2024] HCA 4. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:44 am
This led to the licensing of Park View Insurance Company as a pure captive for parent company HCA Inc., a Nashville-based operator of hospitals and health systems throughout the country. [read post]
28 May 2008, 7:03 am
It's a "who's who" of corporations who have reported losses: United Parcel Service; Google; Royal Bank of Canada; Hill-Rom Holdings of Batesville, Indiana; HCA Inc., the largest U.S. hospital chain; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; and, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, among others. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:25 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
  The real authorities on manner of manufacture – the High Court in National Research and Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents (‘NRDC’) [1959] HCA 67, and the Full Federal Court decisions in CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing [1994] FCA 1168 and Grant v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFC 120 – are now viewed principally through the lens of these non-binding Office decisions. [read post]